Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Scientific Utopia III: Crowdsourcing Science.
Uhlmann, Eric Luis; Ebersole, Charles R; Chartier, Christopher R; Errington, Timothy M; Kidwell, Mallory C; Lai, Calvin K; McCarthy, Randy J; Riegelman, Amy; Silberzahn, Raphael; Nosek, Brian A.
Afiliação
  • Uhlmann EL; 1 Organizational Behaviour Area, INSEAD, Singapore.
  • Ebersole CR; 2 Department of Psychology, University of Virginia.
  • Chartier CR; 3 Department of Psychology, Ashland University.
  • Errington TM; 4 Center for Open Science, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Kidwell MC; 5 Department of Psychology, University of Utah.
  • Lai CK; 6 Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.
  • McCarthy RJ; 7 Center for the Study of Family Violence and Sexual Assault, Northern Illinois University.
  • Riegelman A; 8 University Libraries, University of Minnesota.
  • Silberzahn R; 9 Department of Business and Management, University of Sussex.
  • Nosek BA; 2 Department of Psychology, University of Virginia.
Perspect Psychol Sci ; 14(5): 711-733, 2019 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31260639
ABSTRACT
Most scientific research is conducted by small teams of investigators who together formulate hypotheses, collect data, conduct analyses, and report novel findings. These teams operate independently as vertically integrated silos. Here we argue that scientific research that is horizontally distributed can provide substantial complementary value, aiming to maximize available resources, promote inclusiveness and transparency, and increase rigor and reliability. This alternative approach enables researchers to tackle ambitious projects that would not be possible under the standard model. Crowdsourced scientific initiatives vary in the degree of communication between project members from largely independent work curated by a coordination team to crowd collaboration on shared activities. The potential benefits and challenges of large-scale collaboration span the entire research process ideation, study design, data collection, data analysis, reporting, and peer review. Complementing traditional small science with crowdsourced approaches can accelerate the progress of science and improve the quality of scientific research.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ciência / Utopias / Crowdsourcing / Relações Interprofissionais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ciência / Utopias / Crowdsourcing / Relações Interprofissionais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article