Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of an AI system for the automated detection of glaucoma from stereoscopic optic disc photographs: the European Optic Disc Assessment Study.
Rogers, Thomas W; Jaccard, Nicolas; Carbonaro, Francis; Lemij, Hans G; Vermeer, Koenraad A; Reus, Nicolaas J; Trikha, Sameer.
Afiliação
  • Rogers TW; Visulytix Ltd, Screenworks, Highbury Grove, Highbury East, London, N5 2EF, UK. tom@visulytix.com.
  • Jaccard N; Visulytix Ltd, Screenworks, Highbury Grove, Highbury East, London, N5 2EF, UK.
  • Carbonaro F; Mater Dei Hospital, Triq Dun Karm, L'Imsida, Malta.
  • Lemij HG; Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Vermeer KA; Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Reus NJ; Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Trikha S; Amphia Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Breda, The Netherlands.
Eye (Lond) ; 33(11): 1791-1797, 2019 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31267086
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the performance of a deep learning based Artificial Intelligence (AI) software for detection of glaucoma from stereoscopic optic disc photographs, and to compare this performance to the performance of a large cohort of ophthalmologists and optometrists.

METHODS:

A retrospective study evaluating the diagnostic performance of an AI software (Pegasus v1.0, Visulytix Ltd., London UK) and comparing it with that of 243 European ophthalmologists and 208 British optometrists, as determined in previous studies, for the detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy from 94 scanned stereoscopic photographic slides scanned into digital format.

RESULTS:

Pegasus was able to detect glaucomatous optic neuropathy with an accuracy of 83.4% (95% CI 77.5-89.2). This is comparable to an average ophthalmologist accuracy of 80.5% (95% CI 67.2-93.8) and average optometrist accuracy of 80% (95% CI 67-88) on the same images. In addition, the AI system had an intra-observer agreement (Cohen's Kappa, κ) of 0.74 (95% CI 0.63-0.85), compared with 0.70 (range -0.13-1.00; 95% CI 0.67-0.73) and 0.71 (range 0.08-1.00) for ophthalmologists and optometrists, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the performance of the deep learning system and ophthalmologists or optometrists.

CONCLUSION:

The AI system obtained a diagnostic performance and repeatability comparable to that of the ophthalmologists and optometrists. We conclude that deep learning based AI systems, such as Pegasus, demonstrate significant promise in the assisted detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Disco Óptico / Inteligência Artificial / Fotografação / Doenças do Nervo Óptico / Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto / Diagnóstico por Computador / Aprendizado Profundo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Disco Óptico / Inteligência Artificial / Fotografação / Doenças do Nervo Óptico / Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto / Diagnóstico por Computador / Aprendizado Profundo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article