Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determination of gastrointestinal passage rate using three different markers in laying hens.
Kolakshyapati, Manisha; Bailey, Craig; Zimazile Sibanda, Terence; Morgan, Natalie; Ruhnke, Isabelle.
Afiliação
  • Kolakshyapati M; Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Bailey C; North Hill Veterinary Clinic, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Zimazile Sibanda T; Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Morgan N; Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ruhnke I; Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) ; 103(5): 1427-1436, 2019 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31298444
ABSTRACT
The titanium dioxide (TiO2 ) marker technique is currently widely practiced as a method to evaluate gastrointestinal (GI) passage rate in poultry. However, this method requires sacrificing the animal to obtain digesta samples, is labour-intensive and eliminates the possibility of follow-up studies with the same individual. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the radiographic methods barium-impregnated polyethylene spheres (BIPS) and barium sulphate (BaSO4 ) suspension are in agreement with the TiO2 technique and can be used as an alternative method for GI passage rate determination in laying hens. Whole-body radiographs were taken at different time points. Hens of group 3 (n = 55) were orally inoculated with 5 g of feed mixed with 0.15 g TiO2 , 5 hens per time point sacrificed, and whole gastrointestinal organs (crop, proventriculus, gizzard, small intestine and large intestine) were collected and analysed for TiO2 content. The average marker passage rate of hens administered BaSO4 was significantly faster than those administered BIPS (gizzard 15.2 hr vs. 43.2 hr; small intestine 15.2 hr vs. 38.4 hr, respectively). A greater percentage of BIPS remained in the crop at 0, 0.5, 2, 3 and 8 hr post-inoculation (p.i.) and in the gizzard at 2, 24, 36 and 48 hr p.i. (all p < 0.05) compared to TiO2 . In conclusion, the evaluation of the GI transit time is feasible using BIPS, TiO2 and BaSO4 . The evaluation of the GI transit time using BIPS and BaSO4 needs further investigation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Titânio / Sulfato de Bário / Galinhas / Meios de Contraste / Polietileno / Motilidade Gastrointestinal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Titânio / Sulfato de Bário / Galinhas / Meios de Contraste / Polietileno / Motilidade Gastrointestinal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article