Early termination of resuscitation in in-hospital cardiac arrest and impact to the outcome calculations.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Some in-hospital resuscitation attempts are assessed futile and terminated early on. We hypothesized that if these cases are reported separately, the true outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest is better reflected. METHODS: We conducted a 3-year prospective observational Utstein-style study in Tampere, Finland. All adult in-hospital cardiac arrests outside critical care areas attended by hospital's rapid response team were included. Resuscitation attempts that were terminated within 10 minutes were considered early terminations. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 199 in-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Twenty-seven (14%) resuscitation attempts were terminated early due to the presumed futility of the attempt with median resuscitation duration of 5 (4, 7) minutes. These cases and the 172 patients with full resuscitation attempt were of comparable age, sex and comorbidity. Early terminated resuscitation attempts were more often unwitnessed (63% vs. 10%, P < .001) with initial non-shockable rhythm (100% vs. 80%, P = .006) when compared with full attempts. The most frequently reported reasons for termination decisions were non-witnessed arrest presenting asystole as initial rhythm and severe acute illness. The hospital survival with good neurological outcome and 1-year survival were 30% and 25% for the whole cohort, and 34% and 29% when early terminated resuscitation attempts were excluded. CONCLUSION: One-seventh of resuscitation attempts were terminated early on due to presumed futility of the attempt. Short- and long-term outcomes were 5% and 4% better when early terminated attempts were excluded from the outcome analyses. We believe that in-hospital cardiac arrest outcome is not as poor as repeatedly presented in the literature.