Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effectiveness of Classroom Vocabulary Intervention for Adolescents With Language Disorder.
Lowe, Hilary; Henry, Lucy; Joffe, Victoria L.
Afiliação
  • Lowe H; Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Henry L; Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Joffe VL; Division of Language and Communication Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, United Kingdom.
J Speech Lang Hear Res ; 62(8): 2829-2846, 2019 08 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31339808
ABSTRACT
Purpose Phonological-semantic intervention has been shown to be effective in enhancing the vocabulary skills of children with language disorder in small-group or individual settings. Less is known about vocabulary interventions for adolescents with language disorder in whole-class models of delivery. The current study investigated the effectiveness of phonological-semantic vocabulary intervention for adolescents with language disorder, delivered by secondary school teachers within science lessons. Method Seventy-eight adolescents with language disorder, aged 11-14 years, were taught science curriculum words by teachers in class, under 2 conditions (a) 10 words taught through usual teaching practice and (b) 10 matched words taught using an experimental intervention known as Word Discovery, which embedded phonological-semantic activities into the teaching of the syllabus. Ten similar control words received no intervention. Word knowledge was assessed pre-intervention, postintervention, and follow-up. Results At pre-intervention, measures of depth of word knowledge and expressive word use did not differ between usual teaching practice and experimental words. At postintervention, depth of knowledge of experimental words was significantly greater than that of usual teaching practice words. This significant advantage was not maintained at follow-up, although depth of knowledge for experimental words remained significantly higher at follow-up than at pre-intervention. At postintervention, expressive use of experimental words was significantly greater than that of usual teaching practice words, and this significant difference was maintained at follow-up. There was no change in students' depth of knowledge or expressive use of no-intervention words over time, confirming that the findings were not due to maturity or practice effects. Conclusion The experimental intervention was more effective than usual teaching practice in increasing the word knowledge of participants. Clinical and teaching implications include the importance of intervening during the adolescent years, with classroom vocabulary intervention being a viable option for collaborative teacher and speech and language therapy/pathology practice.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes / Vocabulário / Transtornos da Linguagem / Terapia da Linguagem Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes / Vocabulário / Transtornos da Linguagem / Terapia da Linguagem Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article