Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Levosimendan in patients with reduced left ventricular function undergoing isolated coronary or valve surgery.
van Diepen, Sean; Mehta, Rajendra H; Leimberger, Jeffrey D; Goodman, Shaun G; Fremes, Stephen; Jankowich, Rachael; Heringlake, Matthias; Anstrom, Kevin J; Levy, Jerrold H; Luber, John; Nagpal, A Dave; Duncan, Andra E; Argenziano, Michael; Toller, Wolfgang; Teoh, Kevin; Knight, J David; Lopes, Renato D; Cowper, Patricia A; Mark, Daniel B; Alexander, John H.
Afiliação
  • van Diepen S; Division of Cardiology, Departments of Critical Care and Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Canadian VIGOUR Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: sv9@ualberta.ca.
  • Mehta RH; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Leimberger JD; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Goodman SG; Canadian VIGOUR Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, Division of Cardiology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Fremes S; Schulich Heart Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Jankowich R; Tenax Therapeutics, Morrisville, NC.
  • Heringlake M; University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Anstrom KJ; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Levy JH; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Luber J; Franciscan Health System, Tacoma, Wash.
  • Nagpal AD; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Duncan AE; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Argenziano M; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
  • Toller W; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Teoh K; Southlake Regional Health Center, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada.
  • Knight JD; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Lopes RD; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Cowper PA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Mark DB; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Alexander JH; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 159(6): 2302-2309.e6, 2020 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31358329
OBJECTIVE: In the Levosimendan in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Requiring Cardiopulmonary Bypass (LEVO-CTS) trial, no differences in clinical outcomes were observed between levosimendan and placebo in a broad population of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In previous studies, the benefits of levosimendan were most clearly evident in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. In a prespecified analysis of LEVO-CTS, we compared treatment-related outcomes and costs across types of cardiac surgical procedures. METHODS: Overall, 563 (66.4%) patients underwent isolated CABG, 97 (11.4%) isolated valve, and 188 (22.2%) combined CABG/valve surgery. Outcomes included the co-primary 4-component composite (30-day mortality, 30-day renal replacement, 5-day myocardial infarction, or 5-day mechanical circulatory support), the 2-component composite (30-day mortality or 5-day mechanical circulatory support), 90-day mortality, low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), and 30-day medical costs. RESULTS: The 4- and 2-component outcomes were not significantly different with levosimendan and placebo in patients undergoing CABG (15.2% vs 19.3% and 7.8% vs 10.4%), valve (49.0% vs 33.3% and 22.4% vs 2.1%), or combined procedures (39.6% vs 35.9% and 24.0% vs 19.6%). Ninety-day mortality was lower with levosimendan in isolated CABG (2.1% vs 7.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.64), but not significantly different in valve (8.3% vs 2.0%; HR, 4.10; 95% CI, 0.46-36.72) or combined procedures (10.4% vs 7.6%; HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.53-3.64; interaction P = .011). LCOS (12.0% vs 22.1%; odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.76; interaction P = .118) was significantly lower in levosimendan-treated patients undergoing isolated CABG. Excluding study drug costs, median and mean 30-day costs were $53,707 and $65,852 for levosimendan and $54,636 and $67,122 for placebo, with a 30-day mean difference (levosimendan - placebo) of -$1270 (bootstrap 95% CI, -$8722 to $6165). CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan was associated with lower 90-day mortality and LCOS in patients undergoing isolated CABG, but not in those undergoing isolated valve or combined CABG/valve procedures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Cardiotônicos / Ponte de Artéria Coronária / Função Ventricular Esquerda / Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Simendana / Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Cardiotônicos / Ponte de Artéria Coronária / Função Ventricular Esquerda / Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Simendana / Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article