Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multimodal Clinical Imaging Assessment of the Outcome in Mild-to-Moderate Acne: A Prospective Study.
Kyrgidis, Athanassios; Becker, Markus; Zampeli, Vasiliki; Fauger, Aurélie; Sayag, Michèle; Zouboulis, Christos C.
Afiliação
  • Kyrgidis A; Division of Evidence-Based Dermatology, Departments of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Immunology, Dessau Medical Center, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Dessau, Germany.
  • Becker M; Departments of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Immunology, Dessau Medical Center, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Dessau, Germany.
  • Zampeli V; Departments of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Immunology, Dessau Medical Center, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Dessau, Germany.
  • Fauger A; Innovation - Research and Development Coordination, NAOS - BIODERMA, Lyon, France.
  • Sayag M; Innovation - Research and Development Coordination, NAOS - BIODERMA, Lyon, France.
  • Zouboulis CC; Division of Evidence-Based Dermatology, Departments of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Immunology, Dessau Medical Center, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Dessau, Germany, christos.zouboulis@mhb-fontane.de.
Dermatology ; 235(6): 471-477, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31390623
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The quality of outcome assessment in acne studies has been either subjective/insufficient or time consuming through the ordinary lesion counting.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the application of multimodal clinical imaging (MCI), a combination of imaging technology and computation, in the assessment of acne lesions in a clinical study setting.

METHODS:

A prospective, monocentric, single-group open study designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of a cosmetic product (IP/SG) in subjects with mild-to-moderate facial acne by classical clinical counting (CCC) - change in the total/inflammatory/noninflammatory acne lesion number compared with baseline (D0) - Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) and self-reported outcomes. Concomitantly, MCI was administered. The study was performed for 12 weeks (D84) with a 4-week follow-up (D112).

RESULTS:

Mean age of patients (n = 49) was 18.2 ± 3.7 years (range 13-25). The mean acne duration was 3.8 ± 2.8 years. The total number of lesions did not differ significantly between D0/D84 by both CCC and MCI. However, the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) and uncomfortable feeling improved at D28/D0, the perception of oily skin improved at D14/D0, and the perception of sticky skin improved from D28/D0 to D56/D0. Deterioration was detected between D84/D0 and D112/D0, namely after product discontinuation. Interestingly, a change in trend was recorded for acne lesions at D14/D0 by MCI but not by CCC.

CONCLUSION:

MCI, applied for the first time in a small clinical study setting, is at least as reliable as CCC and may allow for a sensitive longitudinal evaluation of single acne lesions and their response to products, especially in conditions where clinical evaluation reaches its limits.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acne Vulgar / Cosméticos / Dermatoses Faciais / Imagem Óptica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acne Vulgar / Cosméticos / Dermatoses Faciais / Imagem Óptica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article