Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of Day 5 KIDScore™ morphokinetic prediction models of implantation and live birth after single blastocyst transfer.
Reignier, Arnaud; Girard, Jean-Maxime; Lammers, Jenna; Chtourou, Sana; Lefebvre, Tiphaine; Barriere, Paul; Freour, Thomas.
Afiliação
  • Reignier A; Service de biologie et médecine de la reproduction, CHU Nantes, 38 boulevard Jean Monnet, 44093, Nantes, France.
  • Girard JM; Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie UMR 1064, INSERM, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Lammers J; Faculté de médecine, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Chtourou S; Centre d'AMP Procréalis, La Roche-sur-Yon, France.
  • Lefebvre T; Service de biologie et médecine de la reproduction, CHU Nantes, 38 boulevard Jean Monnet, 44093, Nantes, France.
  • Barriere P; Service de biologie et médecine de la reproduction, CHU Nantes, 38 boulevard Jean Monnet, 44093, Nantes, France.
  • Freour T; Laboratoire de biologie de la reproduction et de cytogénétique, Hôpital Aziza Othmana, Tunis, Tunisia.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 36(11): 2279-2285, 2019 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31444634
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

While several studies reported the association between morphokinetic parameters and implantation, few predictive models were developed to predict implantation after day 5 embryo transfer, generally without external validation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the respective performance of 2 commercially available morphokinetic-based models (KIDScore™ Day 5 versions 1 and 2) for the prediction of implantation and live birth after day 5 single blastocyst transfer.

METHODS:

This monocentric retrospective study was conducted on 210 ICSI cycles with single day 5 embryo transfer performed with a time-lapse imaging (TLI) system between 2013 and 2016. The association between both KIDScore™ and the observed implantation and live birth rates was calculated, as well as the agreement between embryologist's choice for transfer and embryo ranking by the models.

RESULTS:

Implantation and live birth rate were both 35.7%. A significant positive correlation was found between both models and implantation rate (r = 0.96 and r = 0.90, p = 0.01) respectively. Both models had statistically significant but limited predictive power for implantation (AUC 0.60). There was a fair agreement between the embryologists' choice and both models (78% and 61% respectively), with minor differences in case of discrepancies.

CONCLUSIONS:

KIDScore™ Day 5 predictive models are significantly associated with implantation rates after day 5 single blastocyst transfer. However, their predictive performance remains perfectible. The use of these predictive models holds promises as decision-making tools to help the embryologist select the best embryo, ultimately facilitating the implementation of SET policy. However, embryologists' expertise remains absolutely necessary to make the final decision.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantação do Embrião / Blastocisto / Fertilização in vitro / Técnicas de Cultura Embrionária / Transferência Embrionária Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantação do Embrião / Blastocisto / Fertilização in vitro / Técnicas de Cultura Embrionária / Transferência Embrionária Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article