Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility, safety, and long-term efficacy of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation for tumors adjacent to the diaphragm in the hepatic dome: a case-control study.
Schullian, Peter; Putzer, Daniel; Laimer, Gregor; Levy, Elliot; Bale, Reto.
Afiliação
  • Schullian P; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Putzer D; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Laimer G; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Levy E; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Bale R; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. reto.bale@i-med.ac.at.
Eur Radiol ; 30(2): 950-960, 2020 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31489472
OBJECTIVES: Achievement of adequate treatment margins may be challenging when the target is either difficult to visualize, awkward to access, or situated adjacent to vulnerable structures. Treatment of tumors located close to the diaphragm in the hepatic dome is challenging for percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation for these reasons. The purpose was to assess the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcome of multi-probe stereotactic RF ablation (SRFA) of liver tumors in the subdiaphragmatic area. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2018, 177 patients (82 HCCs, 6 ICCs, and 89 metastatic tumors) underwent SRFA of 238 tumors abutting the diaphragm in the hepatic dome. For comparison, 177 patients were randomly selected from our database by the R package "MatchIt" for propensity score matching to compare treatment safety and efficacy in this retrospective, single-center study. RESULTS: Median treated tumor size was 2.2 cm (range 0.5 to 10 cm). SRFA was primarily successful for 232/238 (97.5%) tumors. Five tumors were successfully retreated, resulting in a secondary technical efficacy rate of 99.6%. Local tumor recurrence developed in 21 of 238 tumors (8.8%). The major ablation complication rate was 10.7% (22 of 204). Twelve (55%) of 22 major complications could be successfully treated by the interventional radiologist in the same anesthesia session. There was no significant difference in adverse events or disease control rates between the subdiaphragmatic tumors and matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: SRFA is a safe and feasible option in the management of difficult-to-treat tumors abutting the diaphragm in the hepatic dome, with similar safety profile compared with matched controls. KEY POINTS: • RFA was primarily successful for 232/238 (97.5%) subdiaphragmatic dome tumors. Local tumor recurrence developed in 21 of 238 tumors (8.8%). • The major complication rate directly related to ablation of the hepatic dome tumors was 10.7% (22 of 204). 12/22 (55%) of major complications could be successfully treated in the same anesthesia session. • There was no significant difference in adverse events or disease control rates between the subdiaphragmatic tumors and matched controls.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ablação por Cateter / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ablação por Cateter / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article