Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The performance indicator of colonic intubation (PICI) in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund, Martin; Erichsen, Rune; Njor, Sisse Helle; Laurberg, Søren; Valori, Roland; Andersen, Berit.
Afiliação
  • Lund M; Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital , Randers , Denmark.
  • Erichsen R; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark.
  • Njor SH; Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital , Randers , Denmark.
  • Laurberg S; Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital , Randers , Denmark.
  • Valori R; Department of Surgery, Section for Colorectal Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark.
  • Andersen B; Department of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Gloucester , UK.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 54(9): 1176-1181, 2019 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31498716
Objective: Cecal intubation rate (CIR) is known to be inversely associated with interval colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Cecal intubation may be achieved by the use of force and sedation jeopardizing patient safety. The Performance Indicator of Colonic Intubation (PICI) is defined as the proportion of colonoscopies achieving cecal intubation with use of ≤2 mg midazolam and no-mild patient-experienced discomfort. We aimed (i) to measure the variation of PICI between colonoscopists and colonoscopy units; (ii) to assess the correlation between the individual components of PICI; and (iii) to evaluate the association between PICI and commonly used performance indicators. Materials and methods: For the period 1 July 2015 through 30 June 2017 of the prevalent round of the Danish FIT-based CRC screening program, we included colonoscopies performed at four units in the Central Denmark Region within 60 days after a positive FIT-test. The PICI variation was evaluated using rates and ranges. Correlations between individual PICI components were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients. Polyp detection rate (PDR), Adenoma detection rate (ADR), Polyp retrieval rate (PRR) and Withdrawal time (WT) were assessed within PICI quartiles. Results: The overall PICI was 78.7% with substantial variation between colonoscopists (40.0-91.9%) and units (72.6-82.0%). CIR was significantly correlated with patient-experienced comfort (r = 0.49, n = 73, p < .0001) and we observed that colonoscopists with a PICI between 79.9% and 84.3%) had the highest ADR. Conclusion: We found a substantial variation in PICI between colonoscopists and between colonoscopy units, which may reflect potential for quality improvements.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Colonoscopia / Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Colonoscopia / Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article