Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Afatinib versus methotrexate as second-line treatment in Asian patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck progressing on or after platinum-based therapy (LUX-Head & Neck 3): an open-label, randomised phase III trial.
Guo, Y; Ahn, M-J; Chan, A; Wang, C-H; Kang, J-H; Kim, S-B; Bello, M; Arora, R S; Zhang, Q; He, X; Li, P; Dechaphunkul, A; Kumar, V; Kamble, K; Li, W; Kandil, A; Cohen, E E W; Geng, Y; Zografos, E; Tang, P Z.
Afiliação
  • Guo Y; Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: pattrickguo@gmail.com.
  • Ahn MJ; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Chan A; State Key Laboratory in Translational Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Wang CH; Department of Medical Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan.
  • Kang JH; The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul.
  • Kim SB; Department of Otolaryngology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Bello M; Department of Oncology, St Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
  • Arora RS; Department Oncology, Sujan Surgical Cancer Hospital and Amravati Cancer Foundation, Amravati, India.
  • Zhang Q; Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
  • He X; Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing.
  • Li P; West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Dechaphunkul A; Division of Medical Oncology, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
  • Kumar V; Department of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow.
  • Kamble K; Department of Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, India.
  • Li W; Department of Hematology and Oncology, First Hospital Affiliated to Jilin University, Jilin, China.
  • Kandil A; Internal Medicine, Alexandria University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt.
  • Cohen EEW; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, USA.
  • Geng Y; Biostatistics, Boehringer Ingelheim (China) Investment Co., Ltd, China.
  • Zografos E; Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.
  • Tang PZ; Department of Oncology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ann Oncol ; 30(11): 1831-1839, 2019 11 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31501887
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Treatment options are limited for patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) following progression after first-line platinum-based therapy, particularly in Asian countries. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

In this randomised, open-label, phase III trial, we enrolled Asian patients aged ≥18 years, with histologically or cytologically confirmed recurrent/metastatic HNSCC following first-line platinum-based therapy who were not amenable for salvage surgery or radiotherapy, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0/1. Patients were randomised (2  1) to receive oral afatinib (40 mg/day) or intravenous methotrexate (40 mg/m2/week), stratified by ECOG performance status and prior EGFR-targeted antibody therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent central review committee blinded to treatment allocation.

RESULTS:

A total of 340 patients were randomised (228 afatinib; 112 methotrexate). After a median follow-up of 6.4 months, afatinib significantly decreased the risk of progression/death by 37% versus methotrexate (hazard ratio 0.63; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.82; P = 0.0005; median 2.9 versus 2.6 months; landmark analysis at 12 and 24 weeks, 58% versus 41%, 21% versus 9%). Improved PFS was complemented by quality of life benefits. Objective response rate was 28% with afatinib and 13% with methotrexate. There was no significant difference in overall survival. The most common grade ≥3 drug-related adverse events were rash/acne (4% with afatinib versus 0% with methotrexate), diarrhoea (4% versus 0%), fatigue (1% versus 5%), anaemia (<1% versus 5%) and leukopenia (0% versus 5%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Consistent with the phase III LUX-Head & Neck 1 trial, afatinib significantly improved PFS versus methotrexate, with a manageable safety profile. These results demonstrate the efficacy and feasibility of afatinib as a second-line treatment option for certain patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01856478.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Metotrexato / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço / Afatinib / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Metotrexato / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço / Afatinib / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article