Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Surgical Resection on Survival Outcomes After Chemoradiotherapy in Anal Adenocarcinoma.
Li, Richard; Shinde, Ashwin; Fakih, Marwan; Sentovich, Stephen; Melstrom, Kurt; Nelson, Rebecca; Glaser, Scott; Chen, Yi-Jen; Goodman, Karyn; Amini, Arya.
Afiliação
  • Li R; Department of Radiation Oncology.
  • Shinde A; Department of Radiation Oncology.
  • Fakih M; Department of Medical Oncology.
  • Sentovich S; Department of Surgical Oncology, and.
  • Melstrom K; Department of Surgical Oncology, and.
  • Nelson R; Department of Information Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California; and.
  • Glaser S; Department of Radiation Oncology.
  • Chen YJ; Department of Radiation Oncology.
  • Goodman K; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
  • Amini A; Department of Radiation Oncology.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 17(10): 1203-1210, 2019 10 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31590155
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Anal adenocarcinoma is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis, and no randomized data are available to guide management. Prior retrospective analyses offer differing conclusions on the benefit of surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in these patients. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to analyze survival outcomes in patients undergoing CRT with and without subsequent surgical resection.

METHODS:

Patients with adenocarcinoma of the anus diagnosed in 2004 through 2015 were identified using the NCDB. Patients with metastatic disease and survival <90 days were excluded. We analyzed patients receiving CRT and stratified by receipt of surgical resection. Logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of use of surgery and to form a propensity score-matched cohort. Overall survival (OS) was compared between treatment strategies using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS:

We identified 1,747 patients with anal adenocarcinoma receiving CRT, of whom 1,005 (58%) received surgery. Predictors of increased receipt of surgery included age <65 years, private insurance, overlapping involvement of the anus and rectum, N0 disease, and external-beam radiation dose ≥4,000 cGy. With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 5-year OS was 61.1% in patients receiving CRT plus surgery compared with 39.8% in patients receiving CRT alone (log-rank P<.001). In multivariate analysis, surgery was associated with significantly improved OS (hazard ratio, -0.59; 95% CI, 0.50-0.68; P<.001). This survival benefit persisted in a propensity score-matched cohort (log-rank P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

In the largest series of anal adenocarcinoma cases to date, treatment with CRT followed by surgery was associated with a significant survival benefit compared with CRT alone in propensity score-matching analysis. Our findings support national guideline recommendations of neoadjuvant CRT followed by resection for patients with anal adenocarcinoma.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Ânus / Adenocarcinoma / Quimiorradioterapia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Ânus / Adenocarcinoma / Quimiorradioterapia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article