Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting functional responses in agro-ecosystems from animal movement data to improve management of invasive pests.
Wilber, Mark Q; Chinn, Sarah M; Beasley, James C; Boughton, Raoul K; Brook, Ryan K; Ditchkoff, Stephen S; Fischer, Justin W; Hartley, Steve B; Holmstrom, Lindsey K; Kilgo, John C; Lewis, Jesse S; Miller, Ryan S; Snow, Nathan P; VerCauteren, Kurt C; Wisely, Samantha M; Webb, Colleen T; Pepin, Kim M.
Afiliação
  • Wilber MQ; Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, USA.
  • Chinn SM; USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80521-2154, USA.
  • Beasley JC; Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, P.O. Drawer E, Aiken, South Carolina, 29081, USA.
  • Boughton RK; Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, P.O. Drawer E, Aiken, South Carolina, 29081, USA.
  • Brook RK; Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Ona, Florida, 33865, USA.
  • Ditchkoff SS; Department of Animal & Poultry Science and Indigenous Land Management Institute, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5AB, Canada.
  • Fischer JW; School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, 36849 , USA.
  • Hartley SB; USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80521-2154, USA.
  • Holmstrom LK; U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, 700 Cajundome Boulevarde, Lafayette, Louisiana, 70506, USA.
  • Kilgo JC; Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, USDA Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80526, USA.
  • Lewis JS; USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, P.O. Box 700, New Ellenton, South Carolina, 29809, USA.
  • Miller RS; College of Integrative Sciences and Arts, Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona, 85212, USA.
  • Snow NP; Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, USDA Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80526, USA.
  • VerCauteren KC; USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80521-2154, USA.
  • Wisely SM; USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80521-2154, USA.
  • Webb CT; Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA.
  • Pepin KM; Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, USA.
Ecol Appl ; 30(1): e02015, 2020 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31596984
ABSTRACT
Functional responses describe how changing resource availability affects consumer resource use, thus providing a mechanistic approach to prediction of the invasibility and potential damage of invasive alien species (IAS). However, functional responses can be context dependent, varying with resource characteristics and availability, consumer attributes, and environmental variables. Identifying context dependencies can allow invasion and damage risk to be predicted across different ecoregions. Understanding how ecological factors shape the functional response in agro-ecosystems can improve predictions of hotspots of highest impact and inform strategies to mitigate damage across locations with varying crop types and availability. We linked heterogeneous movement data across different agro-ecosystems to predict ecologically driven variability in the functional responses. We applied our approach to wild pigs (Sus scrofa), one of the most successful and detrimental IAS worldwide where agricultural resource depredation is an important driver of spread and establishment. We used continental-scale movement data within agro-ecosystems to quantify the functional response of agricultural resources relative to availability of crops and natural forage. We hypothesized that wild pigs would selectively use crops more often when natural forage resources were low. We also examined how individual attributes such as sex, crop type, and resource stimulus such as distance to crops altered the magnitude of the functional response. There was a strong agricultural functional response where crop use was an accelerating function of crop availability at low density (Type III) and was highly context dependent. As hypothesized, there was a reduced response of crop use with increasing crop availability when non-agricultural resources were more available, emphasizing that crop damage levels are likely to be highly heterogeneous depending on surrounding natural resources and temporal availability of crops. We found significant effects of crop type and sex, with males spending 20% more time and visiting crops 58% more often than females, and both sexes showing different functional responses depending on crop type. Our application demonstrates how commonly collected animal movement data can be used to understand context dependencies in resource use to improve our understanding of pest foraging behavior, with implications for prioritizing spatiotemporal hotspots of potential economic loss in agro-ecosystems.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ecossistema / Produtos Agrícolas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ecossistema / Produtos Agrícolas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article