Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What are the most important unanswered research questions in trial retention? A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership: the PRioRiTy II (Prioritising Retention in Randomised Trials) study.
Brunsdon, Dan; Biesty, Linda; Brocklehurst, Peter; Brueton, Valerie; Devane, Declan; Elliott, Jim; Galvin, Sandra; Gamble, Carrol; Gardner, Heidi; Healy, Patricia; Hood, Kerenza; Jordan, Joan; Lanz, Doris; Maeso, Beccy; Roberts, Amanda; Skene, Imogen; Soulsby, Irene; Stewart, Derek; Torgerson, David; Treweek, Shaun; Whiting, Caroline; Wren, Sharon; Worrall, Andrew; Gillies, Katie.
Afiliação
  • Brunsdon D; Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Biesty L; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Evidence Synthesis Ireland, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland.
  • Brocklehurst P; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Brueton V; Department of Adult Nursing, Kings College London, London, UK.
  • Devane D; Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland.
  • Elliott J; Health Research Authority, National Health Service, London, UK.
  • Galvin S; Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland.
  • Gamble C; Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Gardner H; Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Healy P; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Evidence Synthesis Ireland, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland.
  • Hood K; Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
  • Jordan J; European Patients' Academy, London, UK.
  • Lanz D; Women's Health Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Maeso B; James Lind Alliance, Wessex Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Roberts A; Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Skene I; Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Soulsby I; Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Stewart D; Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Torgerson D; York Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK.
  • Treweek S; Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Whiting C; James Lind Alliance, Wessex Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Wren S; Action on Hearing Loss, British Deaf Association, Deafscotland, Glasgow, UK.
  • Worrall A; Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Gillies K; Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. k.gillies@abdn.ac.uk.
Trials ; 20(1): 593, 2019 Oct 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31615577
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

One of the top three research priorities for the UK clinical trial community is to address the gap in evidence-based approaches to improving participant retention in randomised trials. Despite this, there is little evidence supporting methods to improve retention. This paper reports the PRioRiTy II project, a Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) that identified and prioritised unanswered questions and uncertainties around trial retention in collaboration with key stakeholders.

METHODS:

This PSP was conducted in collaboration with the James Lind Alliance, a non-profit making initiative, to support key stakeholders (researchers, patients, and the public) in jointly identifying and agreeing on priority research questions. There were three stages. (1) First an initial online survey was conducted consisting of six open-ended questions about retention in randomised trials. Responses were coded into thematic groups to create a longlist of questions. The longlist of questions was checked against existing evidence to ensure that they had not been answered by existing research. (2) An interim stage involved a further online survey where stakeholders were asked to select questions of key importance from the longlist. (3) A face-to-face consensus meeting was held, where key stakeholder representatives agreed on an ordered list of 21 unanswered research questions for methods of improving retention in randomised trials.

RESULTS:

A total of 456 respondents yielded 2431 answers to six open-ended questions, from which 372 questions specifically about retention were identified. Further analysis included thematically grouping all data items within answers and merging questions in consultation with the Steering Group. This produced 27 questions for further rating during the interim survey. The top 21 questions from the interim online survey were brought to a face-to-face consensus meeting in which key stakeholder representatives prioritised the order. The 'Top 10' of these are reported in this paper. The number one ranked question was 'What motivates a participant's decision to complete a clinical trial?' The entire list will be available at www.priorityresearch.ie .

CONCLUSION:

The Top 10 list can inform the direction of future research on trial methods and be used by funders to guide projects aiming to address and improve retention in randomised trials.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento / Projetos de Pesquisa / Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Seleção de Pacientes / Prioridades em Saúde Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento / Projetos de Pesquisa / Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Seleção de Pacientes / Prioridades em Saúde Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article