Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Translating evidence into practice: recommendations by a UK expert panel on the use of aflibercept in diabetic macular oedema.
Pearce, Ian; Bailey, Clare; Fletcher, Emily; Ghanchi, Faruque; Rennie, Christina; Santiago, Cynthia; Napier, Jackie; Yang, Yit.
Afiliação
  • Pearce I; Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK. Ian.Pearce@rlbuht.nhs.uk.
  • Bailey C; University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Fletcher E; Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK.
  • Ghanchi F; Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
  • Rennie C; Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
  • Santiago C; Aberdeen Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Napier J; Medical Affairs, Bayer Plc, Reading, UK.
  • Yang Y; The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Eye (Lond) ; 34(5): 969-981, 2020 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31619777
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This paper describes recommendations from a panel of UK retina experts on aflibercept in diabetic macular oedema (DMO).

METHODS:

A roundtable meeting was held in London, UK in March 2018. The meeting was sponsored by Bayer.

RESULTS:

Recommendations are based on clinical experience and level 1 evidence. Clinical experience supports the evidence base, reinforcing that aflibercept should be initiated with intensive proactive dosing at 2 mg every 4 weeks. Most panel members use six initial 4-weekly doses as in Protocol T, rather than five initial monthly doses as recommended in the Summary of product characteristics (SmPC). After intensive proactive dosing, patients with a good response (meet Protocol T 'improvement' criteria ≥5-letter improvement in visual acuity [VA] and/or ≥10% improvement in central subfield thickness [CST] from baseline) but who are not yet stable should continue with 4-weekly aflibercept until stability is reached. Patients with a good response and stability should initiate monitor-and-extend (not in line with SmPC). Those with a sub-optimal response (meet 'improvement' criteria but with additional concerns e.g. fluid worsening on macular volume map) should continue with 4-weekly aflibercept but additional treatments should be considered (aflibercept is not licensed for combination treatment). For patients with no response (no change, or meeting Protocol T 'worsening' criteria [≥5-letter decrease in VA and/or ≥ 10% increase in CST] from baseline), switching to a non-anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS:

Clinical experience reinforces that, when using aflibercept in DMO, the licensed posology or Protocol T regimens achieve the best outcomes.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Edema Macular / Diabetes Mellitus / Retinopatia Diabética Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Edema Macular / Diabetes Mellitus / Retinopatia Diabética Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article