Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Two tiered approaches combining alternative test methods and minimizing the use of reconstructed human cornea-like epithelium tests for the evaluation of eye irritation potency of test chemicals.
Ko, Kyung Yuk; Jeon, Hye Lyun; Kim, Joohwan; Kim, Tae Sung; Hong, Yoon-Hee; Jeong, Mi Kyung; Park, Kyo-Hyun; Kim, Bae-Hwan; Park, Sera; Jang, Won-Hee; Cho, Sun-A; An, Susun; Cho, Ah Rang; Yi, Jung-Sun; Kim, Ji-Young; Kim, Hak; Lee, Jong Kwon; Park, Ki Sook.
Afiliação
  • Ko KY; Toxicological Screening & Testing Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Jeon HL; Toxicological Screening & Testing Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim J; Toxicological Screening & Testing Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim TS; Toxicological Screening & Testing Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Hong YH; Toxicological Screening & Testing Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Jeong MK; Major in Public Health, Faculty of Food and Health Sciences, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Park KH; Major in Public Health, Faculty of Food and Health Sciences, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim BH; Major in Public Health, Faculty of Food and Health Sciences, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Park S; AmorePacific R&D Center, Yongin-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Jang WH; AmorePacific R&D Center, Yongin-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Cho SA; AmorePacific R&D Center, Yongin-si, Republic of Korea.
  • An S; AmorePacific R&D Center, Yongin-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Cho AR; Toxicological Screening & Testing Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Yi JS; Toxicological Screening & Testing Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JY; Toxicological Screening & Testing Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim H; Toxicological Screening & Testing Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee JK; Toxicological Research Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Park KS; Toxicological Screening & Testing Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: kispark@korea.kr.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 63: 104675, 2020 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31648046
ABSTRACT
In order to overcome the limitations of single in vitro eye irritation tests, Integrated Approaches to Testing Assessment strategies have been suggested for evaluating eye irritation. This study developed two tiered approaches combining alternative test methods. They were designed in consideration of the solubility property of test chemicals and to use the RhCE tests at final steps. The tiered approach A is composed of the STE, BCOP, HET-CAM or RhCE tests, whereas the tiered approach B is designed to perform simultaneously two in vitro test methods at the first stage and the RhCE test at the final stage. The predictive capacity of the two tiered approaches was estimated using 47 chemicals. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity value of the tiered approach A were 95.7% (45/47), 100% (34/34), and 84.6% (11/13), respectively, whereas those of the tiered approach B were 95.7% (45/47), 97.1% (33/34), and 92.3% (12/13), respectively. The approach A and B were considered to be available methods for distinguishing test chemicals of Category 1 (all 73.3%) and No Category (84.6% and 92.3%), respectively. Especially, the approach B was considered as an efficient method as the Bottom-Up approach, because it predicted correctly test chemicals classified as No Category.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes de Toxicidade / Córnea / Epitélio / Irritantes Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes de Toxicidade / Córnea / Epitélio / Irritantes Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article