Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does early anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction prevent development of meniscal damage? Results from a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
Snoeker, Barbara A; Roemer, Frank W; Turkiewicz, Aleksandra; Lohmander, Stefan; Frobell, Richard B; Englund, Martin.
Afiliação
  • Snoeker BA; Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Lund, Sweden barbara.snoeker@med.lu.se.
  • Roemer FW; Radiology, Universitatsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Turkiewicz A; Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Lohmander S; Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Lund, Sweden.
  • Frobell RB; Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Lund, Sweden.
  • Englund M; Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Lund, Sweden.
Br J Sports Med ; 54(10): 612-617, 2020 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31653779
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To determine development of new and worsening meniscal damage over 5 years after acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury comparing rehabilitation plus early ACL reconstruction ('early-ACLR') versus rehabilitation with optional delayed ACL reconstruction ('optional-delayed-ACLR').

METHODS:

We used knee MRIs from the only randomised controlled trial in the field including 121 young adults. One musculoskeletal radiologist read baseline and 5-year follow-up images using the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Osteoarthritis Score (ACLOAS). We defined development (ie, new and worsening) of meniscal damage both dichotomously and as a sum score representing severity (based on the reclassified ACLOAS meniscus grades). In the full analysis set, we analysed development of meniscal damage (yes/no) with logistic regression and severity with zero-inflated Poisson regression and adjusted for age, sex and baseline meniscal damage.

RESULTS:

Over 5 years, new or worsening meniscal damage developed in 45% of subjects with early-ACLR and in 53% of subjects with optional-delayed-ACLR. The relative risk for development of meniscal damage on knee level was 1.3 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.9) in optional-delayed-ACLR versus early-ACLR. For medial and lateral meniscal damage, respectively, the relative risks were 2.1 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.9) and 1.0 (95% CI 0.6 to 1.5). The mean severity score was 1.5 higher (more severe damage) on knee level in optional-delayed-ACLR versus early-ACLR (95% CI 1.1 to 1.9) among those with meniscal damage at 5 years. For medial and lateral meniscal damage, respectively, the corresponding scores were 1.7 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.5) and 1.1 (95% CI 0.8 to 1.4).

CONCLUSION:

A strategy of early-ACLR may reduce development of medial meniscal damage following acute ACL injury. For the lateral meniscus, ACLR seems neither to be protective nor to increase the risk of damage. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN 84752559.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Tempo para o Tratamento / Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Lesões do Menisco Tibial Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Tempo para o Tratamento / Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Lesões do Menisco Tibial Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article