Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What Do Former Residents Say About Their Nondesignated Preliminary Year? A Survey of Prelims' Experiences in a General Surgery Residency Program.
Rajesh, Aashish; Asaad, Malke; Chandra, Abhishek; Rivera, Mariela; Stulak, John M; Heller, Stephanie F; Farley, David R.
Afiliação
  • Rajesh A; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Asaad M; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Chandra A; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Rivera M; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Stulak JM; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Heller SF; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Farley DR; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: Farley.David@mayo.edu.
J Surg Educ ; 77(2): 281-290, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31677981
OBJECTIVE: The nondesignated preliminary (NDP) position in general surgery (GS) offers a 1-year surgical training opportunity for medical school graduates prior to obtaining categorical residency positions. Given that there is little long-term follow-up on the experiences of NDP residents, we sought to determine how NDPs felt about their intern year in GS. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of all NDP GS interns from 1993 to 2018. SETTING: Academic, tertiary care center with a large GS residency program (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN). PARTICIPANTS: NDP GS interns (n = 151). RESULTS: Two-hundred and four surveys were emailed and 151 (62%) former NDP residents responded. Exposure to diverse pathology (85%), opportunity to work with experts (85%) and operative experience (72%) were the top 3 positive experiences from the NDP year. The uncertainty of being an NDP resident (78%) and experience compared to categorical counterparts (32%) were cited as the top 2 negative experiences. While 73% (n = 110) considered their NDP year to have laid a "strong" foundation for their future career, most respondents felt that the year was stressful and suggested improving mentoring and support for preliminary residents. Eighty-two percent (n = 124) of respondents stated that, they would be willing to redo their preliminary year. Fifty-four percent (n = 82) of respondents stated that they might have preferred a categorical position at a smaller institution versus a preliminary year. Forty percent of respondents (n = 60) reported fewer interviews and 24% (n = 36) reported a similar number of interviews offered when applying to the Match as a PGY1 prelim resident. CONCLUSIONS: Pursuing the NDP year is difficult, given the uncertainty that looms and the immense pressure to perform well. While the vast majority of our NDPs obtained categorical residency spots following their 1 year of training, feedback from this survey using 25 years of experience suggests that we can and should do more to mentor, support, and assist these residents.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cirurgia Geral / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cirurgia Geral / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article