Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of a multiplex gastrointestinal PCR panel for the aetiological diagnosis of infectious diarrhoea.
Leli, Christian; Di Matteo, Luigi; Gotta, Franca; Vay, Daria; Cavallo, Valeria; Mazzeo, Roberta; Busso, Simone; Carrabba, Laura; Rocchetti, Andrea.
Afiliação
  • Leli C; Microbiology Laboratory, SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy.
  • Di Matteo L; Microbiology Laboratory, SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy.
  • Gotta F; Microbiology Laboratory, SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy.
  • Vay D; Pathology Unit, SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy.
  • Cavallo V; Microbiology Laboratory, SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy.
  • Mazzeo R; Microbiology Laboratory, SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy.
  • Busso S; Microbiology Laboratory, SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy.
  • Carrabba L; Microbiology Laboratory, SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy.
  • Rocchetti A; Microbiology Laboratory, SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 52(2): 114-120, 2020 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31710244
ABSTRACT

Background:

Infectious diarrhoea is a significant cause of morbidity worldwide. Culture and microscopy are time-consuming and have a low yield. New rapid molecular methods such as multiplex PCR, have been recently introduced for aetiological diagnosis. Aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of the FilmArray gastrointestinal panel with that of standard culture for aetiological diagnosis of infectious diarrhoea.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective analysis of results of stool samples already processed as part of routine clinical care in the interval from March 2016 to March 2019.

Results:

One hundred and eighty-three stool samples from as many patients were both cultured and tested by FilmArray and the comparison of diagnostic accuracy between culture and FilmArray with respect to Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica and Shiga-like toxin producing E. coli O157 gave the following

results:

100% (95% confidence interval (CI) 85-100%) sensitivity; 93.4% (95% CI 87.9-96.6%) specificity; 74.3% (95% CI 57.5-86.4%) positive predictive value; 100% (95% CI 96.7-100%) negative predictive value; 2.9 (95% CI 1.6-5.1) positive likelihood ratio; zero negative likelihood ratio. By means of FilmArray gastrointestinal (GI) panel, we could identify 34.5% more pathogens (p = .001). Bacteria were mostly detected in patients with 6 or more years of age (χ2=17.1; p = .009) during summer.

Conclusions:

FilmArray GI panel showed a very good diagnostic performance compared to culture for diagnosis of infectious diarrhoea and gave a more detailed picture of the spectrum of the pathogens involved.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular / Diarreia / Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular / Diarreia / Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article