Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Genomic heterogeneity in peritoneal implants: A differential analysis of gene expression using nanostring Human Cancer Reference panel identifies a malignant signature.
Mhawech-Fauceglia, Paulette; Izevbaye, Iyare; Spindler, Tassja; Wang, Guisong; Hwang, Helena; Samrao, Damanzoopinder; Elishaev, Ester; Maxwell, G Larry; Lawrenson, Kate; Darcy, Kathleen M.
Afiliação
  • Mhawech-Fauceglia P; Department of Pathology, Division of Gynecologic Pathology at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: pfauceglia@auroradx.com.
  • Izevbaye I; Division of Molecular Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology at University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Canada. Electronic address: Izevbaye@ualberta.ca.
  • Spindler T; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Wang G; Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Hwang H; Department of Pathology at University of Texas, Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Samrao D; Department of Pathology, Division of Gynecologic Pathology at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Elishaev E; Department of Pathology at UPMC, Pittsburg, PA, USA.
  • Maxwell GL; Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA; Inova
  • Lawrenson K; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Cente
  • Darcy KM; Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA; Jo
Gynecol Oncol ; 156(1): 6-12, 2020 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31711656
OBJECTIVES: Peritoneal implants of ovarian borderline serous tumors are diagnostically challenging. Distinguishing invasive from non-invasive cases is crucial for patient management. This study aims to develop a molecular signature to distinguish invasive implants with malignant potential from those with benign. METHODS: Archival formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues were retrieved from 3 institutions, with consensus histologic review. Lesions were classified as a non-invasive implant (n = 10), invasive implant (n = 9) or high grade (HG) peritoneal metastasis from HG serous ovarian carcinoma (n = 4). The nCounter® GX Human Cancer Gene Reference Assay was used to profile expression of 230 cancer genes and 6 control genes. The DEGs in HG peritoneal metastases compared to non-invasive implants were identified using T-tests performed in the NanoString Diff package, then used to cluster cases using the Eisen cluster 3.0 package. Lasso in glmnet package was used to select the subset of genes that most strongly correlate with a malignant potential. RESULTS: 37 genes were downregulated and 16 genes were upregulated in HG peritoneal metastases. Using this 53-gene signature, one of nine of the invasive implants clustered with the HG peritoneal metastasis. Expression of ABCB1, CDC2, CDKN1A, FAT1, MMP9, MSH2, NQO1 and TOP2A were sufficient to indicate malignant potential of implants. The HG peritoneal metastasis and one invasive implant exhibited a high malignant likelihood (>92%) whereas the non-invasive implants and eight invasive implants displayed a low malignant likelihood (≤0.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Invasive implants are heterogenous and often morphologically indistinguishable lesions with transcriptomes that may be classified as malignant or not. Additional research is needed to determine the importance of these genes as drivers and/or surrogates of malignant potential, and their utility for triaging invasive implants.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias Peritoneais / Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias Peritoneais / Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article