Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recognizing the peak bone mass (age 30) as a cutoff point to achieve the success of orthodontic implants.
Tseng, Yu-Chuan; Tsai, Chia-Chun; Cheng, Jung-Hsuan; Chou, Szu-Ting; Pan, Chin-Yun; Chen, Ping-Ho; Chen, Chun-Ming.
Afiliação
  • Tseng YC; School of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Tsai CC; Department of Orthodontics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Cheng JH; School of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Chou ST; Department of Orthodontics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Pan CY; School of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Chen PH; Department of Orthodontics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Chen CM; School of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Odontology ; 108(3): 503-510, 2020 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31802301
ABSTRACT
The aim of present study was to investigate the critical risk factor (age 30 peak bone mass) to evaluate the success of orthodontic implants. A total of 426 orthodontic implants were placed in 270 patients as orthodontic anchorages. Data were analyzed according to patient's characteristics, location of placement, implant categories, and orthodontic force. The young patients were the age ≤ 30 years and the older patients were the age > 30 years. Statistical analysis was performed and a p value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. The Chi-square or Fisher exact test was used depending on sample sizes. The null hypothesis was no statistically significant correlation between age ≤ 30 years and age > 30 years. The overall success rate (with and without predrill) was 89.2%. The success rate of orthodontic implants was significantly larger in younger patients (89.9%) than in older patients (76.1%). Recognizing age-related factor in the success rates, older patient (> 30 years) were significant lower than young patients (≤ 30 years) in the gender (female and male), malocclusion (Class II), facial pattern (ortho and hyperdivergent), location (infrazygomatic crest), jaw (maxilla), side (right), material (titanium and stainless), length (9 mm and 10 mm), diameter (2 mm), load (< 3 weeks), and force (intrusion). Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. Age 30 is a cutoff point to achieve the success of orthodontic implants. The success rates of older patients (age > 30 years) were significant lower than young patients (age ≤ 30 years), especially in female.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Procedimentos de Ancoragem Ortodôntica / Má Oclusão Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Procedimentos de Ancoragem Ortodôntica / Má Oclusão Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article