Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk factors for cervical ectopic pregnancy.
Hoyos, Luis R; Tamakuwala, Sejal; Rambhatla, Anupama; Brar, Harpreet; Vilchez, Gustavo; Allsworth, Jenifer; Rodriguez-Kovacs, Javier; Awonuga, Awoniyi.
Afiliação
  • Hoyos LR; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wayne State University/Hutzel Women's Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States. Electronic address: lhoyosmartinez@mednet.ucla.edu.
  • Tamakuwala S; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wayne State University/Hutzel Women's Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States.
  • Rambhatla A; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wayne State University/Hutzel Women's Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States.
  • Brar H; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wayne State University/Hutzel Women's Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States.
  • Vilchez G; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, United States.
  • Allsworth J; University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, United States.
  • Rodriguez-Kovacs J; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wayne State University/Hutzel Women's Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
  • Awonuga A; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wayne State University/Hutzel Women's Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; : 101665, 2019 Dec 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31811970
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate risk factors for cervical ectopic pregnancies.

METHODS:

Retrospective, quasi-experimental case-control study of cervical ectopic pregnancy (CEP) cases from 2000-2013. Two groups were selected as controls, patients with tubal ectopic (TEP) and intrauterine pregnancies (IUP) without a history of TEP, matched by year of pregnancy and randomly sampled in a 13 case-control ratio per each study group.

RESULTS:

21 cases were identified and 126 controls included, 63 TEP and IUP each. A binary logistic regression model was used to analyze whether statistically significant preceding factors from a bivariate analysis could predict CEP. Compared to patients with IUP, CEP patients had a higher history of elective abortions, D&C and cervical excisional procedures, with a high effect size (>0.7). Compared to patients with TEP, CEP patients had a higher history of D&C and cervical excisional procedures, with a high effect size (>.7). The risk of CEP was significantly higher with a prior history of D&C compared to an IUP (aOR 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-9.1; p=0.04) and a TEP (aOR 6.1; 95% CI, 1.8-21.2; p=0.04).

CONCLUSION:

D&C is a strong risk factor for CEP when compared to pregnancies in other locations. These findings confirm previous associations described in case series.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article