Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Universal Principled Review: A Community-Driven Method to Improve Peer Review.
Krummel, Matthew; Blish, Catherine; Kuhns, Michael; Cadwell, Ken; Oberst, Andrew; Goldrath, Ananda; Ansel, K Mark; Chi, Hongbo; O'Connell, Ryan; Wherry, E John; Pepper, Marion.
Afiliação
  • Krummel M; Department of Pathology, ImmunoX Initiative, and Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. Electronic address: matthew.krummel@ucsf.edu.
  • Blish C; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
  • Kuhns M; Department of Immunobiology, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.
  • Cadwell K; Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine at the Skirball Institute and Department of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
  • Oberst A; Department of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
  • Goldrath A; Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Molecular Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
  • Ansel KM; Sandler Asthma Basic Research Center and Department of Microbiology & Immunology, and ImmunoX Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
  • Chi H; Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
  • O'Connell R; Huntsman Cancer Institute and the Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Pathology at the University of Utah, 15 N. Medical Dr. East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
  • Wherry EJ; Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics and Institute for Immunology, Perelman School of Medicine, and Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • Pepper M; Department of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Cell ; 179(7): 1441-1445, 2019 Dec 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31835023
ABSTRACT
Despite being a staple of our science, the process of pre-publication peer review has few agreed-upon standards defining its goals or ideal execution. As a community of reviewers and authors, we assembled an evaluation format and associated specific standards for the process as we think it should be practiced. We propose that we apply, debate, and ultimately extend these to improve the transparency of our criticism and the speed with which quality data and ideas become public.
Assuntos
Texto completo
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Revisão por Pares Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article
Texto completo
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Revisão por Pares Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article