Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bladder-sparing treatment of nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Ericson, Kyle J; Murthy, Prithvi B; Bryk, Darren J; Ramkumar, Rathika R; Broughman, James R; Khanna, Abhinav; Mian, Omar Y; Campbell, Steven C.
Afiliação
  • Ericson KJ; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Murthy PB; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Bryk DJ; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Ramkumar RR; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Broughman JR; Department of Radiology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Khanna A; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Mian OY; Department of Radiology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Campbell SC; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol ; 17(12): 697-707, 2019 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31851158
ABSTRACT
Bladder-sparing therapies for the treatment of nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancers are included in both American and European guidelines. Numerous treatment approaches have been described, including partial cystectomy, radiation monotherapy, and radical transurethral resection. However, the most oncologically favorable and well-studied regimen employs a multimodal approach that consists of maximal transurethral resection of the bladder tumor followed by concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This sequence, referred to as trimodal therapy (TMT), has been evaluated with robust retrospective comparative studies and prospective series, although a randomized trial comparing TMT with radical cystectomy has not been performed. Despite promising reports of 5-year overall survival rates of 50% to 70% in well-selected patients, relatively few patients qualify as ideal candidates for TMT. Specifically, contemporary series exclude patients who have clinical stage T3 disease, multifocal tumors, coexisting carcinoma in situ, or hydronephrosis. Herein, we review all forms of bladder-preserving therapies with an emphasis on TMT, highlighting the rationale of each component, survival outcomes, and future directions.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bexiga Urinária / Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Carcinoma in Situ / Cistectomia / Hidronefrose Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bexiga Urinária / Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Carcinoma in Situ / Cistectomia / Hidronefrose Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article