Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
When worlds collide: Challenges to implementing communication research in community oncology practices.
Brannen, Elise N; Pollak, Kathryn I; Farrell, David; Baranowski, Rebecca A; Arnold, Gerald K; Rohowyj, Nancy; Goldman, Julie L; Tulsky, James A.
Afiliação
  • Brannen EN; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: EliseN_Brannen@dfci.harvard.edu.
  • Pollak KI; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Farrell D; People Designs, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Baranowski RA; American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Arnold GK; American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Rohowyj N; American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Goldman JL; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Tulsky JA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Patient Educ Couns ; 103(5): 1057-1063, 2020 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31866193
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

During a recent trial assessing the effectiveness of an online communication training for community practice oncologists, we encountered multiple barriers.

METHODS:

We asked oncologists to participate through the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification program. Oncologists collected 25 Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers (CAHPS) surveys from patients and 4 audio-recorded clinic encounters. They then completed either the ABIM Action Plan (control) or the online Study of Communication in Oncologist Patient Encounters (SCOPE) program (intervention). Oncologists collected another 25 CAHPS surveys and 4 audio-recorded encounters as follow-up.

RESULTS:

We enrolled 146 oncologists in the study. Only 27 completed the study; another 27 actively withdrew, and 94 did not complete the study. We identified four main challenges to participation commitment discrepancies, burden of research, informed consent, and technology. We introduced efforts to overcome these barriers with success limited by time and resources.

CONCLUSION:

When conducting research in community practices, investigators must provide significant support, limit burden, increase flexibility, and conduct thorough pilot testing. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS To improve patient care, research must translate well into the workflow of actual practices. Assessing our experience, we identified challenges and effective solutions to be used by investigators as they plan and implement future communication interventions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comunicação / Comunicação Interdisciplinar / Oncologistas / Oncologia Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comunicação / Comunicação Interdisciplinar / Oncologistas / Oncologia Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article