Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patients' and Clinicians' Preferences on Outcomes and Medication Attributes for Type 2 Diabetes: a Mixed-Methods Study.
Karagiannis, Thomas; Avgerinos, Ioannis; Toumpalidou, Maria; Liakos, Aris; Kitsios, Konstantinos; Dimitriadis, Georgios; Papanas, Nikolaos; Bargiota, Alexandra; Avramidis, Iakovos; Katsoula, Anastasia; Tentolouris, Anastasios; Chatziadamidou, Thekla; Giannakopoulos, Stathis; Alexiadis, Stavros; Kotsa, Kalliopi; Tsapas, Apostolos; Bekiari, Eleni.
Afiliação
  • Karagiannis T; Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. tkaragian@auth.gr.
  • Avgerinos I; Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Toumpalidou M; Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Liakos A; Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Kitsios K; Diabetes Center, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Dimitriadis G; Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Second Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Papanas N; Diabetes Center, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
  • Bargiota A; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
  • Avramidis I; First Medical Department, G. Papanikolaou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Katsoula A; Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Tentolouris A; First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.
  • Chatziadamidou T; Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Giannakopoulos S; Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Alexiadis S; Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Kotsa K; First Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Tsapas A; Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Bekiari E; Diabetes Center, Second Medical Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
J Gen Intern Med ; 2020 Jan 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31898143
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patients' views on the relative importance of treatment outcomes and medication attributes for type 2 diabetes may differ from clinicians' perceptions.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess which treatment outcomes and medication attributes are considered important by patients and clinicians for therapeutic decisions in type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN:

Exploratory, sequential, mixed-methods design comprising a qualitative (focus groups) and a quantitative (survey) phase.

PARTICIPANTS:

Patients in the focus groups (n = 33) and the survey study (n = 656) were recruited from 4 and 9 diabetes clinics across Greece, respectively. Clinicians in the survey study (n = 363) were identified from Greek registries for healthcare professionals. MEASUREMENTS We conducted 6 focus groups to obtain patients' views regarding the impact of type 2 diabetes on their lives. Identified themes informed the development of a survey, which aimed to assess which outcomes and medication attributes are considered most important by patients and clinicians. We calculated odds ratios to compare patients' and clinicians' responses.

RESULTS:

The focus groups identified 6 main themes and 15 subthemes. In the survey study, patients were more likely than clinicians to rate prevention of amputation (odds ratio, 9.32; 95% CI, 6.51 to 13.35), diabetic eye disease (6.16; 4.63 to 8.21), sexual dysfunction, and stroke as important, while clinicians were more likely than patients to choose risk for hypoglycemia, and reduction of all-cause mortality, HbA1c, and body weight. Compared with clinicians, patients were less concerned about drug cost (0.16; 0.11 to 0.23), but more concerned about route of administration and need for less frequent glucose self-monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients and clinicians differ in the perception of the relative importance of treatment outcomes and drug characteristics. Individual patient preferences should be explored and implemented in the therapeutic decision-making for type 2 diabetes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article