Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patterns of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Gawade, Prasad L; Li, Shuling; Henry, David; Smith, Nancy; Belani, Rajesh; Kelsh, Michael A; Bradbury, Brian D.
Afiliação
  • Gawade PL; Center for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA. pgawade@amgen.com.
  • Li S; Chronic Diseases Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Henry D; Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Smith N; DOCS Global, Waltham, MA, USA.
  • Belani R; US Medical Affairs, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  • Kelsh MA; Center for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
  • Bradbury BD; Center for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(9): 4413-4424, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31919669
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate patterns of primary prophylactic (PP) granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use following chemotherapy by cancer type and febrile neutropenia (FN) risk.

METHODS:

Using a commercial administrative database, we identified adult patients diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian cancer, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who initiated chemotherapy with high risk (HR) or intermediate risk (IR) for FN between January 1, 2013, and August 31, 2017. We describe use of PP-G-CSF, proportion completing all their cycles with pegfilgrastim, timing of pegfilgrastim, and duration of short-acting G-CSF.

RESULTS:

Among 22,868 patients (breast 11,513; colorectal 3765; lung 4273; ovarian 1287; and NHL 2030), 36.8% received HR and 63.2% received IR (64.4% of whom had ≥ 1 risk factor [RF] for FN). Proportions of patients receiving PP-G-CSF in the first cycle were 76.1%, 28.2%, and 26.4% among patients receiving HR, IR, and IR plus ≥ 1 RF, respectively. Among breast cancer patients receiving HR regimens and initiating PP-pegfilgrastim, 60.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57.2-63.6%) initiating via on-body injector (OBI) and 51.9% (95% CI 48.0-55.8%) initiating via prefilled syringe (PFS) completed all their cycles with OBI and PFS, respectively. Among all cycles with PP-PFS, 8.5% received PFS on the same day as chemotherapy completion. Mean administrations/cycle were 3.2 (standard deviation [SD] 2.3) for filgrastim, 3.0 (SD 1.6) for filgrastim-sndz, and 4.3 (SD 2.5) for tbo-filgrastim.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is under- and mistimed use of PP-G-CSF among patients at HR for FN. Novel pegfilgrastim delivery devices could help breast cancer patients at HR for FN complete all their cycles with timely prophylaxis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article