Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the Uptake of a Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Termination of Resuscitation Rule.
Teefy, John; Cram, Natalie; Van Zyl, Theunis; Van Aarsen, Kristine; McLeod, Shelley; Dukelow, Adam.
Afiliação
  • Teefy J; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Cram N; Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Van Zyl T; Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Van Aarsen K; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • McLeod S; Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Dukelow A; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Southwest Ontario Regional Base Hospital Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Emerg Med ; 58(2): 254-259, 2020 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31924467
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Previous research has focused on creation and validation of a basic life support rule for termination of resuscitation (TOR) in nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) to identify patients who will not be successfully resuscitated or will not have a favorable outcome. Although now widely implemented, translational research regarding in-field compliance with TOR criteria and barriers to use is scarce.

OBJECTIVES:

This project aimed to assess compliance rates, barriers to use, and effect on ambulance transport rates after implementing TOR criteria for OHCA.

METHODS:

Retrospective chart review of patients ≥ 18 years with OHCA. Data from regional Emergency Medical Services agencies were collected to determine TOR rule compliance for patients meeting criteria, barriers to use, and effect of a TOR rule on ambulance transport.

RESULTS:

There were 552 patients with OHCAs identified. Ninety-one patients met TOR criteria, with paramedics requesting TOR in 81 (89%) cases and physicians granting requests in 65 (80.2%) cases. Perceived barriers to TOR compliance included distraught families, nearby advanced-care paramedics, and unusual circumstances. Reasons for physician refusal of TOR requests included hospital proximity, patient not receiving epinephrine, and poor communication connection to paramedics. Total high priority transports decreased 15.6% after implementation of a TOR rule.

CONCLUSIONS:

The study found high compliance after implementation of a TOR rule and identified potentially addressable barriers to TOR use. Appropriate application of a TOR rule led to reduction in high-priority ambulance transports, potentially reducing futile use of health care resources and risk of ambulance motor vehicle collisions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão / Reanimação Cardiopulmonar / Futilidade Médica / Serviços Médicos de Emergência / Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão / Reanimação Cardiopulmonar / Futilidade Médica / Serviços Médicos de Emergência / Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article