Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of an electronic quality checklist on prescription patterns of prophylactic antiemetic and pain flare medications in the context of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases.
Gaudet, Marc; Linden, Kelly; Renaud, Julie; Samant, Rajiv; Dennis, Kristopher.
Afiliação
  • Gaudet M; Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada. mgaudet@toh.ca.
  • Linden K; Radiation Medicine Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Renaud J; Radiation Medicine Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Samant R; Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
  • Dennis K; Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(9): 4487-4492, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31933067
PURPOSE: International guidelines are available to guide prescription of antiemetic and pain flare medications in patients receiving palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases, but prescription rates are quite variable. We hypothesized that a simple electronic quality checklist could increase the evidence-based use of these medications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We implemented an electronic quality checklist item in our center for all patients treated with palliative radiotherapy for lumbar spine bone metastases. We retrospectively reviewed patients in the 6-month pre- and post-intervention. Patients were stratified according to if they were treated within a dedicated rapid palliative (RPAL) radiotherapy program or not. Chi-square tests were used to compare rates of antiemetic and pain flare medications pre- and post-intervention and RPAL vs not. RESULTS: A total of 375 patients were identified with 42 (11.2%) treated in dedicated RPAL program. The proportion of patients treated with prophylactic antiemetic and pain flare medications pre-intervention (n = 226) and post-intervention (n = 149) was respectively 34.1% vs 59.1% (p < 0.001) and 26.1% vs 43.0% (p = 0.01). Observed differences for antiemetic prescription rates were greater for patients who were not treated within a dedicated palliative radiotherapy program, but this was not the case for pain flare medications. CONCLUSIONS: Our data shows that a simple quality checklist item can have a significant effect on the evidence-based use of prophylactic antiemetic and pain flare medications in patients treated with palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases. We believe such strategies should be routinely included in other clinical pathways to improve the use of symptom control medications.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor / Cuidados Paliativos / Radioterapia / Neoplasias Ósseas / Antieméticos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor / Cuidados Paliativos / Radioterapia / Neoplasias Ósseas / Antieméticos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article