[Comparison of keratometric measurements obtained by the Verion image guided system with the IOLMaster and the Pentacam before cataract extraction surgery].

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the keratometric measurements of the Verion image guided system with the partial coherence interferometry (IOLMaster700) and the scheimpflug corneal topography (Pentacam). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 146 eyes of 88 patients [mean age, (69±10) years; 62 eyes of male patients and 84 eyes of female patients] with cataract were examined before cataract extraction and IOL implantation surgery in the Tenth People's Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University from January 2016 to March 2017. Corneal curvature values acquired by the Verion optical imaging system were compared with the IOLMaster700 and the Pentacam. Keratometric data, magnitude of astigmatism, and steep astigmatic axis measurements from all three instruments were also compared. According to the steep axis of astigmatism, the eyes were divided into groups of with the rule (WTR), against the rule (ATR), and oblique astigmatism. The parameter differences between the Verion and the other devices in the three groups were analyzed. The data were evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance and Bland-Altman plots. Results: The values of steep keratometry (Ks) of the Verion, IOLMaster700, and Pentacam were (44.60±1.32), (44.73±1.37), (44.43±1.35) D, respectively. The values of flat keratometry (Kf) of the Verion, IOLMaster700, and Pentacam were (43.51±1.41), (43.51±1.52), (43.40±1.45) D, respectively. The values of mean keratometry (Km) of the Verion, IOLMaster700, and Pentacam were (44.60±1.32), (44.12±1.35), (43.92±1.34) D, respectively. The values of astigmatism magnitude were (1.09±0.87), (1.24±1.02), (1.04±0.80) D, respectively. The F values were 1.81, 0.31, 0.93 and 2.22 in relation to Ks, Kf, Km and corneal astigmatism magnitude among the three instruments, respectively (all P>0.05). The 95% confidence intervals of Kf, Ks and astigmatism magnitude between the Verion and the other two devices were -1.10 to 0.80 D, -0.55 to 0.88 D; -1.10 D to 1.10 D, -0.80 to 1.04 D; -1.21 to 0.90 D, -0.92 to 1.02 D. The outcomes were considered acceptable. There were no statistically differences in steep astigmatic axis measurements between the Verion and the other two instruments among the WTR (62 eyes), ATR (45 eyes) and oblique (15 eyes) groups (F=0.63, 0.37; P=0.54, 0.72, respectively). Conclusions: The Verion image guided system is a reliable system for the measurement of keratometry values and astigmatism. The keratometric power, magnitude and steep axis of astigmatism have no significant difference, and there is a good agreement among the Verion, IOL Master 700, and Pentacam. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2020, 56 47-52).