How Healthy Is Healthy? Comparison Between Self-Reported Symptoms and Clinical Outcomes in Connection with the Enrollment of Volunteers for Human Exposure Studies on Sensory Irritation Effects.
Adv Exp Med Biol
; 1271: 49-59, 2020.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-31974924
ABSTRACT
Controlled human exposure studies on sensory irritation effects are usually performed with healthy volunteers. Therefore, in most studies pre-screening by a health questionnaire and a detailed medical examination are combined. The aim of this report is to investigate whether self-reported information about smoking and health status is sufficient or whether additional clinical tests are necessary for a successful and safe enrollment of healthy volunteers. There were 409 volunteers (55% female; 17-57 years; 79% non-smokers) who declared interest in participation in the study. However, 87 subjects failed to meet specific inclusion criteria, and further 138 had to be excluded due to the presence of chronic health problems. In effect, 184 subjects passed the initial questionnaire screening and proceed to further examination. Medical examination included electrocardiogram, blood and urine screening, and an olfactory function test. Atopy status was assessed by skin prick or specific IgE testing. Lung function and a methacholine challenge test were performed to assess respiratory health and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Overall, only 107 non-smoking subjects (58% female; 19-40 years) who had no respiratory diseases, allergies, or chronic illnesses could be finally selected. Out of the 107 subjects, 8 were excluded due to positive cotinine tests, laboratory test results outside the reference range, or atypical ECGs. In another 12 subjects, obstruction or a bronchial hyperreactivity was diagnosed. Among the remaining 87 healthy subjects, 26 were classified as atopic and further two as hyposmic. In conclusion, although young and non-smoking volunteers considered themselves healthy by questionnaire, 20% showed signs of a heart, liver, or airway disease, and additional 24% were classified as atopics. This suggests that more detailed clinical testing may be necessary to safely exclude those who may adversely react to controlled exposure with sensory irritants.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Testes de Provocação Brônquica
/
Nível de Saúde
/
Hiper-Reatividade Brônquica
/
Autorrelato
/
Voluntários Saudáveis
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
Limite:
Adolescent
/
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2020
Tipo de documento:
Article