Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can PET-CT predict diagnostic success in ultrasonography-guided transthoracic fine needle aspiration biopsies in lung cancers?
Dogan, C; Fidan, A; Cömert, S S; Kiral, N; Salepçi, B; Parmaksiza, E T; Çaglayan, B.
Afiliação
  • Dogan C; Department Of Chest Diseases, Dr. Lütfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: coskund24@hotmail.com.
  • Fidan A; Department Of Chest Diseases, Dr. Lütfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Cömert SS; Department Of Chest Diseases, Dr. Lütfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Kiral N; Department Of Chest Diseases, Dr. Lütfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Salepçi B; Department Of Chest Diseases, Dr. Lütfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Parmaksiza ET; Department Of Chest Diseases, Dr. Lütfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Çaglayan B; Departmentof Chest Diseases, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Pulmonology ; 26(5): 275-282, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32044295
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To examine any correlations between tumor maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax) in positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and homogeneous/heterogeneous tumor FDG uptake in PET-CT, and the diagnostic success of the procedure in thoracic ultrasonography (US)-guided transthoracic fine needle aspiration biopsy (TFNAB).

METHODS:

The files of patients who underwent thoracic US-guided TFNAB between 2013 and 2018 were examined. Patients who underwent thoracic US-guided TFNAB and were diagnosed as having primary lung cancer were considered as the US-TFNAB diagnostic group. Patients whose disease was diagnosed as primary lung cancer using a different diagnostic method (e.g. CT-guided biopsies, fiberoptic bronchoscopy) due to a lack of diagnosis despite undergoing thoracic US-guided TFNAB were allocated to the US-TFNAB non-diagnostic group. The clinical and radiologic characteristics and PET-CT parameters of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS:

A total of 104 patients were included in the study; 79 (76%) patients whose disease was diagnosed using US-guided TFNAB, and 25 (24%) patients whose primary lung cancer could not be diagnosed with US-guided TFNAB. The mean SUVmax value of the US-TFNAB diagnostic group was 19.5 ±â€¯10.1, whereas it was 15.1 ±â€¯8.9 in the US-TFNAB non-diagnostic group (p = 0.016). Whether a lesion showed homogeneous or heterogeneous FDG uptake did not effect diagnostic success (p = 0.289). SUVmax value was the only effective independent factor in the diagnostic success of the procedure (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS:

High SUVmax values in PET-CT in lung cancers may increase the diagnostic success of US guided-TFNAB procedures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fluordesoxiglucose F18 / Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico / Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fluordesoxiglucose F18 / Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico / Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article