Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Socio-ecological Factors of Zoonotic Diseases Exposure in Colorado Dairy Workers.
Palomares Velosa, Jairo Enrique; Salman, Mo D; Roman-Muniz, Ivette N; Reynolds, Stephen; Linke, Lyndsey; Magnuson, Roberta; McConnel, Craig S; Rao, Sangeeta.
Afiliação
  • Palomares Velosa JE; Animal Population Health Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  • Salman MD; Animal Population Health Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  • Roman-Muniz IN; Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  • Reynolds S; Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  • Linke L; Animal Population Health Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  • Magnuson R; Animal Population Health Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  • McConnel CS; Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
  • Rao S; Animal Population Health Institute, Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
J Agromedicine ; 26(2): 151-161, 2021 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32052708
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Zoonotic pathogens on dairy farms are a known risk for people who work and live there. Exposure and/or transmission of Salmonella serovars, E. coli (O157; H7), Campylobacter jejuni, and Cryptosporidium parvum have been documented to occur in the dairy farm environment. Social ecological factors have been identified as determinants of preventive behaviors of people at risk of infectious diseases.

Methods:

This study described the effect of socio-ecological factors on selected zoonotic bacterial and protozoal diseases in 42 workers of two dairy farms.

Results:

Occupational exposure to Salmonella ser. Dublin, E. coli, and Campylobacter spp. was confirmed. Self-efficacy and negative workplace perceptions were risk factors for Salmonella Dublin exposure (OR = 1.43[95% CI 1.11-2.22] & 1.22 [95% CI 1.02-1.53] respectively,). Additionally, safety knowledge and risk perceptions were protective factors of exposure (OR = 0.90 [95% CI 0.79-1.00]). Positive perceptions of supervisors and coworkers was a protective factor of Campylobacter exposure (OR = 0.89 [95% CI 0.79-0.98]).

Conclusion:

Results indicated that the presence of a supporting organizational environment, good communication with supervisors and coworkers, and training on prevention of zoonotic diseases would potentially reduce occupational exposures to zoonotic diseases on these farms.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Criptosporidiose / Cryptosporidium Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Criptosporidiose / Cryptosporidium Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article