Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with benign and malignant periampullary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.
Podda, Mauro; Gerardi, Chiara; Di Saverio, Salomone; Marino, Marco Vito; Davies, R Justin; Pellino, Gianluca; Pisanu, Adolfo.
Afiliação
  • Podda M; Department of General, Emergency and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Policlinico Universitario "D. Casula", University of Cagliari, SS 554, Km 4,500, 09042, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy. mauropodda@ymail.com.
  • Gerardi C; Centro Di Politiche Regolatorie in Sanità, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche ''Mario Negri'', Milan, Italy.
  • Di Saverio S; Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
  • Marino MV; Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera - Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy.
  • Davies RJ; Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
  • Pellino G; Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
  • Pisanu A; Department of General, Emergency and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Policlinico Universitario "D. Casula", University of Cagliari, SS 554, Km 4,500, 09042, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy.
Surg Endosc ; 34(6): 2390-2409, 2020 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32072286
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although several non-randomized studies comparing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) recently demonstrated that the two operative techniques could be equivalent in terms of safety outcomes and short-term oncologic efficacy, no definitive answer has arrived yet to the question as to whether robotic assistance can contribute to reducing the high rate of postoperative morbidity.

METHODS:

Systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE databases. Prospective and retrospective studies comparing RPD and OPD as surgical treatment for periampullary benign and malignant lesions were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis with no limits of language or year of publication.

RESULTS:

18 non-randomized studies were included for quantitative synthesis with 13,639 patients allocated to RPD (n = 1593) or OPD (n = 12,046). RPD and OPD showed equivalent results in terms of mortality (3.3% vs 2.8%; P = 0.84), morbidity (64.4% vs 68.1%; P = 0.12), pancreatic fistula (17.9% vs 15.9%; P = 0.81), delayed gastric emptying (16.8% vs 16.1%; P = 0.98), hemorrhage (11% vs 14.6%; P = 0.43), and bile leak (5.1% vs 3.5%; P = 0.35). Estimated intra-operative blood loss was significantly lower in the RPD group (352.1 ± 174.1 vs 588.4 ± 219.4; P = 0.0003), whereas operative time was significantly longer for RPD compared to OPD (461.1 ± 84 vs 384.2 ± 73.8; P = 0.0004). RPD and OPD showed equivalent results in terms of retrieved lymph nodes (19.1 ± 9.9 vs 17.3 ± 9.9; P = 0.22) and positive margin status (13.3% vs 16.1%; P = 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS:

RPD is safe and feasible as surgical treatment for malignant or benign disease of the pancreatic head and the periampullary region. Equivalency in terms of surgical radicality including R0 curative resection and number of harvested lymph nodes between the two groups confirmed the reliability of RPD from an oncologic point of view.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ampola Hepatopancreática / Pancreaticoduodenectomia / Neoplasias do Ducto Colédoco / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ampola Hepatopancreática / Pancreaticoduodenectomia / Neoplasias do Ducto Colédoco / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article