Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Peripheral nerve repair throughout the body with processed nerve allografts: Results from a large multicenter study.
Safa, Bauback; Jain, Sonu; Desai, Mihir J; Greenberg, Jeffrey A; Niacaris, Timothy R; Nydick, Jason A; Leversedge, Fraser J; Megee, David M; Zoldos, Jozef; Rinker, Brian D; McKee, Desirae M; MacKay, Brendan J; Ingari, John V; Nesti, Leon J; Cho, Mickey; Valerio, Ian Lee; Kao, Dennis S; El-Sheikh, Yasser; Weber, Renata V; Shores, Jaimie T; Styron, Joseph F; Thayer, Wesley P; Przylecki, Wojciech H; Hoyen, Harry A; Buncke, Gregory M.
Afiliação
  • Safa B; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Buncke Clinic, San Francisco, California.
  • Jain S; Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Desai MJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Greenberg JA; Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana Hand to Shoulder Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Niacaris TR; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, John Peter Smith Hospital, Fort Worth, Texas.
  • Nydick JA; Orthopaedic Surgery, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Temple Terrace, Florida.
  • Leversedge FJ; Divisions of Orthopaedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Megee DM; Plastic, Reconstructive & Hand Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Zoldos J; Orthopaedic Surgery, Arizona Center for Hand Surgery, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Rinker BD; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • McKee DM; Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, University of Kentucky Healthcare, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • MacKay BJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.
  • Ingari JV; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.
  • Nesti LJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Cho M; Clinical and Experimental Orthopaedics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Valerio IL; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Kao DS; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • El-Sheikh Y; Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Weber RV; Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Shores JT; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Multidisciplinary Specialists, Rutherford, New Jersey.
  • Styron JF; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Thayer WP; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Przylecki WH; Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Hoyen HA; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
  • Buncke GM; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio.
Microsurgery ; 40(5): 527-537, 2020 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32101338
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Peripheral nerve damage resulting in pain, loss of sensation, or motor function may necessitate a reconstruction with a bridging material. The RANGER® Registry was designed to evaluate outcomes following nerve repair with processed nerve allograft (Avance® Nerve Graft; Axogen; Alachua, FL). Here we report on the results from the largest peripheral nerve registry to-date.

METHODS:

This multicenter IRB-approved registry study collected data from patients repaired with processed nerve allograft (PNA). Sites followed their own standard of care for patient treatment and follow-up. Data were assessed for meaningful recovery, defined as ≥S3/M3 to remain consistent with previously published results, and comparisons were made to reference literature.

RESULTS:

The study included 385 subjects and 624 nerve repairs. Overall, 82% meaningful recovery (MR) was achieved across sensory, mixed, and motor nerve repairs up to gaps of 70 mm. No related adverse events were reported. There were no significant differences in MR across the nerve type, age, time-to-repair, and smoking status subgroups in the upper extremity (p > .05). Significant differences were noted by the mechanism of injury subgroups between complex injures (74%) as compared to lacerations (85%) or neuroma resections (94%) (p = .03) and by gap length between the <15 mm and 50-70 mm gap subgroups, 91 and 69% MR, respectively (p = .01). Results were comparable to historical literature for nerve autograft and exceed that of conduit.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings provide clinical evidence to support the continued use of PNA up to 70 mm in sensory, mixed and motor nerve repair throughout the body and across a broad patient population.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article