Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biology-inspired microphysiological systems to advance patient benefit and animal welfare in drug development
Marx, Uwe; Akabane, Takafumi; Andersson, Tommy B; Baker, Elizabeth; Beilmann, Mario; Beken, Sonja; Brendler-Schwaab, Susanne; Cirit, Murat; David, Rhiannon; Dehne, Eva-Maria; Durieux, Isabell; Ewart, Lorna; Fitzpatrick, Suzanne C; Frey, Olivier; Fuchs, Florian; Griffith, Linda G; Hamilton, Geraldine A; Hartung, Thomas; Hoeng, Julia; Hogberg, Helena; Hughes, David J; Ingber, Donald E; Iskandar, Anita; Kanamori, Toshiyuki; Kojima, Hajime; Kuehnl, Jochen; Leist, Marcel; Li, Bo; Loskill, Peter; Mendrick, Donna L; Neumann, Thomas; Pallocca, Giorgia; Rusyn, Ivan; Smirnova, Lena; Steger-Hartmann, Thomas; Tagle, Danilo A; Tonevitsky, Alexander; Tsyb, Sergej; Trapecar, Martin; Van de Water, Bob; Van den Eijnden-van Raaij, Janny; Vulto, Paul; Watanabe, Kengo; Wolf, Armin; Zhou, Xiaobing; Roth, Adrian.
Afiliação
  • Marx U; TissUse GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
  • Akabane T; Technische Universitaet Berlin, Germany.
  • Andersson TB; Stem Cell Evaluation Technology Research Association, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Baker E; DMPK, Research and Early Development Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolism, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Beilmann M; Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington DC, USA.
  • Beken S; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Non-clinical Drug Safety, Biberach, Germany.
  • Brendler-Schwaab S; Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Cirit M; BfArM, Bonn, Germany.
  • David R; Javelin Biotech, Inc, Woburn, MA, USA.
  • Dehne EM; Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
  • Durieux I; TissUse GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
  • Ewart L; TissUse GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
  • Fitzpatrick SC; Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
  • Frey O; US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, MD, USA.
  • Fuchs F; InSphero, Schlieren, Switzerland.
  • Griffith LG; Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research Chemical Biology & Therapeutics, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Hamilton GA; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Hartung T; Emulate Inc., Boston, USA.
  • Hoeng J; Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Hogberg H; Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing-Europe, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
  • Hughes DJ; AxoSim, Inc., New Orleans, LA, USA
  • Ingber DE; Philip Morris International R&D, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
  • Iskandar A; Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Kanamori T; CN Bio Innovations Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, UK.
  • Kojima H; Wyss Institute for Biology Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, USA.
  • Kuehnl J; Philip Morris International R&D, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
  • Leist M; National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tokyo, Japan.
  • Li B; Japanese Center for Validation of Animal Methods, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Loskill P; Beiersdorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Mendrick DL; Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing-Europe, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
  • Neumann T; National Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, P.R. China.
  • Pallocca G; Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology IGB, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Rusyn I; Faculty of Medicine, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Smirnova L; National Center for Toxicological Research, FDA, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Steger-Hartmann T; Nortis Inc., Seattle WA, USA.
  • Tagle DA; Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing-Europe, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
  • Tonevitsky A; Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
  • Tsyb S; Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Trapecar M; Bayer, Investigational Toxicology, Berlin, Germany.
  • Van de Water B; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Van den Eijnden-van Raaij J; M.M. Shemyakin & Yu.A. Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia.
  • Vulto P; National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russia.
  • Watanabe K; Russian Ministry of Production and Trade, Moscow, Russia.
  • Wolf A; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Zhou X; Universiteit Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Roth A; Institute for Human Organ and Disease Model Technologies, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
ALTEX ; 37(3): 365-394, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32113184
The first microfluidic microphysiological systems (MPS) entered the academic scene more than 15 years ago and were considered an enabling technology to human (patho)biology in vitro and, therefore, provide alternative approaches to laboratory animals in pharmaceutical drug development and academic research. Nowadays, the field generates more than a thousand scientific publications per year. Despite the MPS hype in academia and by platform providers, which says this technology is about to reshape the entire in vitro culture landscape in basic and applied research, MPS approaches have neither been widely adopted by the pharmaceutical industry yet nor reached regulated drug authorization processes at all. Here, 46 leading experts from all stakeholders - academia, MPS supplier industry, pharmaceutical and consumer products industries, and leading regulatory agencies - worldwide have analyzed existing challenges and hurdles along the MPS-based assay life cycle in a second workshop of this kind in June 2019. They identified that the level of qualification of MPS-based assays for a given context of use and a communication gap between stakeholders are the major challenges for industrial adoption by end-users. Finally, a regulatory acceptance dilemma exists against that background. This t4 report elaborates on these findings in detail and summarizes solutions how to overcome the roadblocks. It provides recommendations and a roadmap towards regulatory accepted MPS-based models and assays for patients' benefit and further laboratory animal reduction in drug development. Finally, experts highlighted the potential of MPS-based human disease models to feedback into laboratory animal replacement in basic life science research.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bem-Estar do Animal / Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos / Dispositivos Lab-On-A-Chip / Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos / Alternativas aos Testes com Animais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bem-Estar do Animal / Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos / Dispositivos Lab-On-A-Chip / Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos / Alternativas aos Testes com Animais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article