Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A better Amazon road network for people and the environment.
Vilela, Thais; Malky Harb, Alfonso; Bruner, Aaron; Laísa da Silva Arruda, Vera; Ribeiro, Vivian; Auxiliadora Costa Alencar, Ane; Julissa Escobedo Grandez, Annie; Rojas, Adriana; Laina, Alejandra; Botero, Rodrigo.
Afiliação
  • Vilela T; Conservation Strategy Fund, Washington, DC 20009; thais@conservation-strategy.org alfonso@conservation-strategy.org.
  • Malky Harb A; Conservation Strategy Fund, La Paz, Bolívia; thais@conservation-strategy.org alfonso@conservation-strategy.org.
  • Bruner A; Conservation Strategy Fund, Washington, DC 20009.
  • Laísa da Silva Arruda V; Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, Brasília-DF 70863-520, Brazil.
  • Ribeiro V; Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, Brasília-DF 70863-520, Brazil.
  • Auxiliadora Costa Alencar A; Stockholm Environment Institute, 104 51 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Julissa Escobedo Grandez A; Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, Brasília-DF 70863-520, Brazil.
  • Rojas A; Conservation Strategy Fund, Lima 15049, Peru.
  • Laina A; Fundación para la Conservación y el Desarrollo Sostenible, Bogotá 111071, Colombia.
  • Botero R; Fundación para la Conservación y el Desarrollo Sostenible, Bogotá 111071, Colombia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 117(13): 7095-7102, 2020 03 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32179680
ABSTRACT
The rapidly expanding network of roads into the Amazon is permanently altering the world's largest tropical forest. Most proposed road projects lack rigorous impact assessments or even basic economic justification. This study analyzes the expected environmental, social and economic impacts of 75 road projects, totaling 12 thousand kilometers of planned roads, in the region. We find that all projects, although in different magnitudes, will negatively impact the environment. Forty-five percent will also generate economic losses, even without accounting for social and environmental externalities. Canceling economically unjustified projects would avoid 1.1 million hectares of deforestation and US$ 7.6 billion in wasted funding for development projects. For projects that exceed a basic economic viability threshold, we identify the ones that are comparatively better not only in terms of economic return but also have lower social and environmental impacts. We find that a smaller set of carefully chosen projects could deliver 77% of the economic benefit at 10% of the environmental and social damage, showing that it is possible to have efficient tradeoff decisions informed by legitimately determined national priorities.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article