Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The vestibulo-masseteric reflex and the acoustic-masseteric reflex: a reliability and responsiveness study in healthy subjects.
Loi, Nicola; Manca, Andrea; Ginatempo, Francesca; Deriu, Franca.
Afiliação
  • Loi N; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 43/b, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
  • Manca A; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 43/b, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
  • Ginatempo F; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 43/b, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
  • Deriu F; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 43/b, 07100, Sassari, Italy. deriuf@uniss.it.
Exp Brain Res ; 238(7-8): 1769-1779, 2020 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32280998
ABSTRACT
The vestibulo-masseteric reflex (VMR or p11 wave), the acoustic-masseteric reflex (AMR or p1/n21 wave) and the mixed vestibulo-cochlear p11/n21 potential are responses of masseter muscles to sound that can be employed to evaluate brainstem function. This study was aimed at establishing the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of these reflex parameters according to the type of electrode configuration. Twenty-two healthy volunteers (MF = 1111; mean age 25.3 ± 5.2 years) participated in two testing sessions separated by one week. Zygomatic and mandibular montages were compared following unilateral and bilateral stimulations. For reliability purposes, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation of the method error (CVME) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated. The minimal detectable difference (MDD) was also determined as a measure of responsiveness. Both VMR (p11 wave) and AMR could be consistently evoked from test to retest, although the frequency rate was significantly higher (all p values ≤ 0.009) with zygomatic (VMR 97.7-100%; AMR 86.9-97.6%) than mandibular montage (VMR 84.7-89.8%; AMR 65.0-67.8%), with no significant differences between unilateral and bilateral stimulations. Good-to-excellent reliability and responsiveness (high ICC, low CVME, SEM and MDD scores) were detected for corrected amplitudes and peak latencies for all reflex responses, whereas raw amplitudes were associated to poor reliability. The reliability of the zygomatic montage proved superior to the mandibular montage for all reflex responses. Given their high test-retest consistency and capability to study different features of the reflex arch, both peak latencies and corrected amplitudes should be reported and considered in the interpretation of reflex testing results.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reflexo / Músculo Masseter Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reflexo / Músculo Masseter Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article