Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic Accuracy of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in Real Life.
Murthi, Mukunthan; Donna, Elio; Arias, Sixto; Villamizar, Nestor R; Nguyen, Dao M; Holt, Gregory E; Mirsaeidi, Mehdi S.
Afiliação
  • Murthi M; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Miami VA Medical Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
  • Donna E; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Miami VA Medical Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
  • Arias S; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Miami VA Medical Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
  • Villamizar NR; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Miami VA Medical Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
  • Nguyen DM; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Miami VA Medical Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
  • Holt GE; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Miami VA Medical Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
  • Mirsaeidi MS; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Miami VA Medical Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 7: 118, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32318581
ABSTRACT

Background:

EBUS-TBNA is an integral tool in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer and other diseases involving mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Most studies attesting to the performance of EBUS-TBNA are prospective analyses performed under strict protocols. The objective of our study was to compare the accuracy of EBUS-TBNA to surgery in diagnosing hilar and mediastinal pathologies in a tertiary hospital, staffed by pulmonologists with and without formal interventional pulmonary training.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed subjects who underwent EBUS-TBNA followed by a confirmatory surgical procedure from January 2012 to December 2018. The primary outcome was to evaluate the accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of all mediastinal disease. Secondary analyses determined the accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in cancer, NSCLC, and non-malignant lesions individually.

Results:

One hundred and forty-three subjects had an EBUS-TBNA procedure followed by surgery. EBUS-TBNA for all pathologies had an accuracy of 81.2% (CI 95% 73.8-87.4) and sensitivity of 55.1% (CI 95% 41.5-68.3). The accuracy and sensitivity of individual groups were cancer (81.7, 48.8%), NSCLC (84, 48.3%), and non-malignancy (78.9, 60%). The NSCLC group had 15 false negatives and 5 (33.3%) of them were due to non-sampling of EBUS accessible nodes. Missed sampling led to a change in the final staging in 8.6% of NSCLC subjects.

Conclusion:

The accuracy of EBUS-TBNA across all groups was comparable to those reported previously. However, the sensitivity was comparatively lower. This was primarily due to the large number of EBUS-TBNA accessible lymph nodes that were not sampled. This data highlights the need for guidelines outlining the best sampling approach and lymph node selection.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article