Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Agreement between Self-Reported "Ideal" and Currently Used Contraceptive Methods among Women Veterans Using the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.
Judge-Golden, Colleen P; Wolgemuth, Tierney E; Zhao, Xinhua; Mor, Maria K; Borrero, Sonya.
Afiliação
  • Judge-Golden CP; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: cpj6@pitt.edu.
  • Wolgemuth TE; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Zhao X; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Mor MK; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Borrero S; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Womens Health Issues ; 30(4): 283-291, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32321666
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Women veterans who use the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System theoretically have access to the full range of contraceptive methods. This study explores match between currently used and self-reported "ideal" methods as a potential marker of contraceptive access and preference matching.

METHODS:

This mixed methods study uses data from a nationally representative survey of reproductive-aged women veterans who use the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System for primary care, including 979 participants at risk of unintended pregnancy. Women reported all contraceptive methods used in the past month and were asked, "If you could choose any method of contraception or birth control to prevent pregnancy, what would be your ideal choice?" and selected a single "ideal" method. If applicable, participants were additionally asked, "Why aren't you currently using this method of contraception?" We used adjusted logistic regression to identify patient-, provider-, and system-level factors associated with ideal-current method match. We qualitatively analyzed open-ended responses about reasons for ideal method nonuse.

RESULTS:

Overall, 58% were currently using their ideal method; match was greatest among women selecting an IUD as ideal (73%). Non-White race/ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.89) and mental illness (adjusted odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.92) were negatively associated with ideal-current match in adjusted analyses; the presence of a gynecologist at the primary care site was associated with an increased odds of match (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.75). Modifiable barriers to ideal method use were cited by 23% of women, including access issues, cost concerns, and provider-level barriers; 79% of responses included nonmodifiable reasons for mismatch including relationship factors and pregnancy plans incongruent with ideal method use, suggesting limitations of our measure based on differential interpretation of the word "ideal."

CONCLUSIONS:

Many women veterans are not currently using the contraceptive method they consider ideal. Results emphasize the complexity of contraceptive method selection and of measuring contraceptive preference matching.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veteranos / Anticoncepção / Comportamento Contraceptivo / Anticoncepcionais / Serviços de Saúde para Veteranos Militares Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veteranos / Anticoncepção / Comportamento Contraceptivo / Anticoncepcionais / Serviços de Saúde para Veteranos Militares Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article