Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical significance of lymphatic invasion in the esophageal region in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.
Sugita, Shizuki; Kuwata, Takeshi; Tokunaga, Masanori; Kaito, Akio; Watanabe, Masahiro; Tonouchi, Akiko; Kinoshita, Takahiro; Nagino, Masato.
Afiliação
  • Sugita S; Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
  • Kuwata T; Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
  • Tokunaga M; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Kaito A; Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
  • Watanabe M; Department of Pathology, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center (EPOC), National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan.
  • Tonouchi A; Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
  • Kinoshita T; Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
  • Nagino M; Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
J Surg Oncol ; 122(3): 433-441, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32359219
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

The lymphatic flow around the esophagogastric junction is complicated. Therefore, it is unclear whether lymphatic invasion in the esophageal region (eLI) and in the gastric region (gLI) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) equally affect the incidence of lymph node metastases (LNM), and consequently, survival.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological data of 175 patients with AEG between January 2008 and July 2017. Risk factors for LNM and impacts of eLI or gLI on survival outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS:

eLI was identified in 34% of the patients (59/175). By multivariate analysis, eLI was associated with an increased risk of both mediastinal LNM (odds ratio [OR] = 2.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-7.05) and abdominal LNM (OR = 5.44, 95% CI 1.95-15.20). The 5-year overall survival for patients with eLI (53%) was significantly worse than for patients without eLI (76%) (hazard ratio = 2.45, 95% CI 1.37-10.01). gLI was not selected in either of these analyses.

CONCLUSIONS:

Positive eLI was strongly associated with mediastinal and abdominal LNM and worse survival in patients with AEG compared with gLI. In the histopathological examination, it seems to make sense to assess eLI and gLI separately.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Junção Esofagogástrica / Linfonodos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Junção Esofagogástrica / Linfonodos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article