Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of adult community-based physical activity interventions with objective physical activity measurements and long-term follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wahlich, Charlotte; Chaudhry, Umar A R; Fortescue, Rebecca; Cook, Derek G; Hirani, Shashivadan; Knightly, Rachel; Harris, Tess.
Afiliação
  • Wahlich C; Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
  • Chaudhry UAR; School of Health Sciences, City University, London, UK.
  • Fortescue R; Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
  • Cook DG; Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
  • Hirani S; Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
  • Knightly R; School of Health Sciences, City University, London, UK.
  • Harris T; Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
BMJ Open ; 10(5): e034541, 2020 05 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32371512
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of physical activity (PA) interventions with objective PA outcomes in adults and to evaluate whether intervention effects were sustained beyond 12 months.

DESIGN:

Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Seven databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane library, CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and ASSIA (Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts)) were searched from January 2000 until December 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA RCTs reporting objective PA outcomes beyond 12 months with community-based participants aged ≥18 years were included; those where controls received active interventions, including advice to increase PA levels, were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND

SYNTHESIS:

Two independent reviewers completed extraction of aggregate data and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses used random-effects models at different follow-up points. Primary outcomes were daily steps and weekly minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA).

RESULTS:

Of 33 282 records identified, nine studies (at generally low risk of bias) were included, five in meta-analyses with 12 months to 4 year follow-up. We observed 12 month increases for intervention vs control participants in steps/day (mean difference (MD)=554 (95% CIs 384 to 724) p<0.0001, I2=0%; 2446 participants; four studies) and weekly MVPA minutes (MD=35 (95% CI 27 to 43) p<0.0001, I2=0%; 2647 participants; four studies). Effects were sustained up to 4 years for steps/day (MD=494 (95% CI 251 to 738) p<0.0001, I2=0%; 1944 participants; four studies) and weekly MVPA minutes (MD=25 (95% CI 13 to 37) p<0.0001, I2=0%; 1458 participants; three studies).

CONCLUSIONS:

There are few PA interventions with objective follow-up beyond 12 months, more studies are needed. However, this review provided evidence of PA intervention effects beyond 12 months and sustained up to 4 years for both steps/day and MVPA. These findings have important implications for potential long-term health benefits. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017075753.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exercício Físico / Vida Independente Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exercício Físico / Vida Independente Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article