Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of biosafety materials of the laser output power.
Rodrigues, Fernanda Cristina Nogueira; de Araújo, Júlia Gomes Lúcio; Dos Santos Araújo, Erika Michele; Lago, Andréa Dias Neves; Mantilla, Taís Fonseca; de Freitas, Patrícia Moreira.
Afiliação
  • Rodrigues FCN; Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, 2227 Professor Lineu Prestes, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil. fernanda_rodrigues@usp.br.
  • de Araújo JGL; Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthesis and Traumatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Dos Santos Araújo EM; Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, 2227 Professor Lineu Prestes, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil.
  • Lago ADN; Department of Dentistry I, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil.
  • Mantilla TF; Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, 2227 Professor Lineu Prestes, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil.
  • de Freitas PM; Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, 2227 Professor Lineu Prestes, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil.
Lasers Med Sci ; 36(2): 311-315, 2021 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32372235
Biosafety materials used in the correct handling of low power laser equipment may interfere on the power delivered at the target tissue and, possibly, on the effects on biological tissues. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interference of the use of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyethylene (PEAD) protection materials on the output power of low power lasers. Two low power diode laser devices with different wavelengths (red and infrared) were used. For each wavelength, two protection materials and two evaluation times (before and after protection) were considered. The output power (mW) was measured with the tip positioned in close contact with the power meter receiver. Parametric statistical test, two-way ANOVA for repeated measures (protection material and time), was performed considering the level of significance of 5%. In respect to "time", all groups had the output power reduced after placing the protective material (p < 0.05). Comparing the protection materials, the PEAD showed a greater reduction in output power than the PVC for both red and infrared wavelengths. It was concluded that, among the biosafety materials tested, PVC is the most suitable for the protection of the tip of the low power lasers.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Contenção de Riscos Biológicos / Lasers Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Contenção de Riscos Biológicos / Lasers Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article