Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prediction of cytomegalovirus infection: A single-center experience utilizing a newly available cell-mediated immunity assay by flow cytometry, a risk factor screening tool, and serologically demonstrated immunity.
Jorgenson, Margaret R; Hillis, Mikala I; Saddler, Christopher M; Smith, Jeannina A; Parajuli, Sandesh; Mandelbrot, Didier A.
Afiliação
  • Jorgenson MR; Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Hillis MI; Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Saddler CM; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Smith JA; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Parajuli S; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Mandelbrot DA; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 22(4): e13311, 2020 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32386076
PURPOSE: Describe use and predictive potential of an intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) cytomegalovirus cell-mediated immunity (CMV CMI) assay and a risk factor screening tool on CMV reactivation in a real-world clinical setting and compare this to serologically demonstrated immunity by CMV IGG. METHODS: Adult transplant patients at our center with the ICS assay resulted between 10/1/2018 and 9/1/2019 were included. Assays were considered positive per manufacturer specifications. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent ICS CMV CMI testing at our institution during the study period. The majority were kidney transplant recipients, 76% were D+/R-, and 76% were receiving CMV treatment. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the assay to predict lack of CMV was 87%; 93% when patients with antiviral resistance were excluded and 91% in only those receiving treatment. The presence of ≤2 clinical risk factors on the screening tool had a PPV of 92% in predicting lack of recurrence. In comparison, serologically demonstrated immunity by CMV IGG had a PPV of 62%. CONCLUSIONS: In our study representing real-world clinical use, the ICS CMV CMI assay and the risk factor screening tool had predictive potential that was superior to serologically demonstrated immunity. The reliability of the assay seemed to decrease with higher degrees of clinical risk suggesting a multimodal screening approach is warranted.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Citomegalovirus / Citometria de Fluxo / Imunidade Celular Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Citomegalovirus / Citometria de Fluxo / Imunidade Celular Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article