Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of varying air cavity on planning dosimetry for rectum patients treated on a 1.5 T hybrid MR-linac system.
Godoy Scripes, Paola; Subashi, Ergys; Burleson, Sarah; Liang, Jiayi; Romesser, Paul; Crane, Christopher; Mechalakos, James; Hunt, Margie; Tyagi, Neelam.
Afiliação
  • Godoy Scripes P; Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Subashi E; Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Burleson S; Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Liang J; Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Romesser P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Crane C; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Mechalakos J; Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Hunt M; Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Tyagi N; Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 21(7): 144-152, 2020 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32445292
PURPOSE: To investigate the dosimetric impact of magnetic (B) field on varying air cavities in rectum patients treated on the hybrid 1.5 T MR-linac. METHODS: Artificial air cavities of varying diameters (0.0, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 5.0 cm) were created for four rectum patients (two prone and two supine). A total of 56 plans using a 7 MV flattening filter-free beam were generated with and without B-field. Reference intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans without air cavity in the presence and absence of B-field were generated to a total dose of 45/50 Gy. The reference plans were copied and recalculated for the varying air cavities. D95 (PTV45 -PTV50 ), D95 (PTV50 -aircavity), V50 (PTV50 -aircavity), Dmax (PTV50 -aircavity), and V110% (PTV50 -aircavity) were extracted for each patient. Annulus rings of 1-mm-diameter step size were generated for one of the air cavity plans (3.0 cm) for all four patients to determine Dmax (%) and V110% (cc) within each annulus. RESULTS: In the presence of B-field, hot spots at the cavity interface start to become visible at ~1 cm air cavity in both supine and prone positioning due to electron return effect (ERE). In the presence of B-field Dmax and V110% varied from 5523 ± 49 cGy and 0.09 ± 0.16 cc for 0 cm air cavity size to 6050 ± 109 cGy and 11.6 ± 6.7 cc for 5 cm air cavity size. The hot spots were located within 3 mm inside the rectal-air interface, where Dmax increased from 110.4 ± 0.5% without B-field to 119.2 ± 0.8 % with B-field. CONCLUSIONS: Air cavities inside rectum affects rectum plan dosimetry due ERE. Location and magnitude of hot spots are dependent on the size of the air cavity.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reto / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reto / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article