Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of State Immunization Information System Based Reminder/Recall for Influenza Vaccinations: A Randomized Trial of Autodialer, Text, and Mailed Messages.
Szilagyi, Peter G; Albertin, Christina S; Saville, Alison W; Valderrama, Rebecca; Breck, Abigail; Helmkamp, Laura; Zhou, Xinkai; Vangala, Sitaram; Dickinson, L Miriam; Tseng, Chi-Hong; Campbell, Jonathan D; Whittington, Melanie D; Roth, Heather; Rand, Cynthia M; Humiston, Sharon G; Hoefer, Dina; Kempe, Allison.
Afiliação
  • Szilagyi PG; Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: pszilagyi@mednet.ucla.edu.
  • Albertin CS; Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Saville AW; Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
  • Valderrama R; Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Breck A; Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Helmkamp L; Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
  • Zhou X; Department of Medicine, Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Vangala S; Department of Medicine, Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Dickinson LM; Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
  • Tseng CH; Department of Medicine, Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Campbell JD; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
  • Whittington MD; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
  • Roth H; Colorado Immunization Information System, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO.
  • Rand CM; Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.
  • Humiston SG; Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO.
  • Hoefer D; New York State Immunization Information System, New York State Department of Health, New York, NY.
  • Kempe A; Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
J Pediatr ; 221: 123-131.e4, 2020 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32446470
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the effect of different modalities of centralized reminder/recall (autodialer, text, mailed reminders) on increasing childhood influenza vaccination. STUDY

DESIGN:

Two simultaneous randomized clinical trials conducted from October 2017 to April 1, 2018, in New York State and Colorado. There were 61 931 children in New York (136 practices) and 23 845 children in Colorado (42 practices) who were randomized to different centralized reminder/recall modalities-4 arms in New York (autodialer, text, mailed, and no reminder control) and 3 arms in Colorado (autodialer, mailed, and no reminder control). The message content was similar across modalities. Up to 3 reminders were sent for intervention arms. The main outcome measure was receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine.

RESULTS:

In New York, compared with the control arm (26.6%), postintervention influenza vaccination rates in the autodialer arm (28.0%) were 1.4 percentage points higher (adjusted risk ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.10), but the rates for text (27.6%) and mail (26.8%) arms were not different from controls. In Colorado, compared with the control arm (29.9%), postintervention influenza vaccination rates for the autodialer (32.9%) and mail (31.5%) arms were 3.0 percentage points (adjusted risk ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.12) and 1.6 percentage points (adjusted risk ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.10) higher, respectively. Compared with the control arm, the incremental cost per additional vaccine delivered was $20 (New York) and $16 (Colorado) for autodialer messages.

CONCLUSIONS:

Centralized reminder/recall for childhood influenza vaccine was most effective via autodialer, less effective via mail, and not effective via text messages. The impact of each modality was modest. Compared with no reminders, the incremental cost per additional vaccine delivered was also modest for autodialer messages. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03294473 and NCT03246100.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vacinas contra Influenza / Sistemas de Alerta / Programas de Imunização / Influenza Humana Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vacinas contra Influenza / Sistemas de Alerta / Programas de Imunização / Influenza Humana Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article