Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anesthetic management of lung transplantation: Results from a multicenter, cross-sectional survey by the society for advancement of transplant anesthesia.
Subramaniam, Kathirvel; Rio, J Mauricio Del; Wilkey, Barbara J; Kumar, Akshay; Tawil, Justin N; Subramani, Sudhakar; Tani, Makiko; Sanchez, Pablo G; Mandell, M Susan.
Afiliação
  • Subramaniam K; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Rio JMD; Divisions of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Wilkey BJ; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA.
  • Kumar A; Medanta Super specialty Hospital, Gurgaon, New Delhi, India.
  • Tawil JN; Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Subramani S; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Iowa Medical Center, Iowa city, Iowa, USA.
  • Tani M; Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
  • Sanchez PG; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Mandell MS; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Clin Transplant ; 34(8): e13996, 2020 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32484978
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Current protocols for the perioperative care of lung transplant (LTX) recipients lack rigorous evidence and are often empiric, based upon institutional preferences. We surveyed LTX anesthesiologists to determine the most common practices.

METHODS:

We developed a survey of 40 questions regarding perioperative care of LTX recipients using Qualtrics software. The survey was sent out to members of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists performing LTX at geographically diverse sites to facilitate data collection for as many practices as possible.

RESULTS:

The responses were center-weighed (127 responses, 85% from academic settings). The clamshell approach was commonly used (70%). Cardiopulmonary bypass was preferred by 56%, ex vivo lung perfusion utilized by 43%, and 49.4% indicated they use lungs from donation after circulatory determination of death. Most (69%) used oximetric pulmonary artery catheters, 60% used tissue oximetry, and 89.3% utilized transesophageal echocardiography. Inhaled nitric oxide was preferred by 48%, restrictive fluid management by 48%, and systemic analgesia advocated by 49% of participants. Inspired oxygen concentration <30% was applied to the new lung on reperfusion by 28% of the respondents.

CONCLUSION:

Variations in healthcare delivery and utilization for LTX recipients indicate gaps in knowledge and potential opportunities to improve the quality of care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Pulmão / Transplantes / Anestesia / Anestésicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Pulmão / Transplantes / Anestesia / Anestésicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article