Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Microbiota of bovine milk, teat skin, and teat canal: Similarity and variation due to sampling technique and milk fraction.
Dahlberg, J; Williams, J E; McGuire, M A; Peterson, H K; Östensson, K; Agenäs, S; Dicksved, J; Waller, K Persson.
Afiliação
  • Dahlberg J; Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: Josef.Dahlberg@slu.se.
  • Williams JE; Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Idaho, Moscow 83844.
  • McGuire MA; Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Idaho, Moscow 83844.
  • Peterson HK; Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Idaho, Moscow 83844.
  • Östensson K; Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Agenäs S; Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Dicksved J; Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Waller KP; Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Animal Health and Antimicrobial Strategies, National Veterinary Institute, 75189 Uppsala, Sweden.
J Dairy Sci ; 103(8): 7322-7330, 2020 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32534929
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sampling technique and milk fraction on bovine milk microbiota data and to compare the microbiota in milk to microbiota on the teat end and in the teat canal. Representative milk samples are highly important for assessment of bacteriological findings and microbiota in milk. Samples were obtained from 5 healthy lactating dairy cows at udder quarter level during 1 milking. Swab samples from the teat end and teat canal, and milk samples collected using different techniques and in different milk fractions were included. Milk was collected by hand stripping and through a teat canal cannula before and after machine milking, through a trans-teat wall needle aspirate after milking, and from udder quarter composite milk. The microbiota of the samples was analyzed with sequencing of the V1-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene. In addition, somatic cell counts and bacterial cultivability were analyzed in the milk samples. Microbiota data were analyzed using multivariate methods, and differences between samples were tested using analysis of similarity (ANOSIM). Differences between samples were further explored via individual studies of the 10 most abundant genera. The microbiota on the teat end, in the teat canal, and in udder quarter composite milk, collected using a milking machine, differed in composition from the microbiota in milk collected directly from the udder quarter. No differences in milk microbiota composition were detected between hand-stripped milk samples, milk samples taken through a teat canal cannula, or milk samples taken as a trans-teat wall needle aspirate before or after milking. We conclude that for aseptic milk samples collected directly from the lactating udder quarter, sampling technique or milk fraction has minor effect on the microbiota composition.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Manejo de Espécimes / Bactérias / Bovinos / Leite / Microbiota Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Manejo de Espécimes / Bactérias / Bovinos / Leite / Microbiota Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article