Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Extra-Articular Augmentation: A Systematic Review.
Hurley, Eoghan T; Manjunath, Amit K; Strauss, Eric J; Jazrawi, Laith M; Alaia, Michael J.
Afiliação
  • Hurley ET; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A.. Electronic address: eoghan.hurley@nyulangone.org.
  • Manjunath AK; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A.
  • Strauss EJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A.
  • Jazrawi LM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A.
  • Alaia MJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy ; 37(1): 381-387, 2021 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32562759
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of the current study is to systematically review the current evidence in the literature to ascertain rates of return to play after ACLR with extra-articular augmentation (EA).

METHODS:

A literature search was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they evaluated and reported on return to play after ACLR + EA; case studies and review articles were excluded. The outcomes measured focused on (1) return to play, (2) return to play at the same or higher level, and (3) timing of return to play. Qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis were performed using SPSS.

RESULTS:

Overall, 19 studies met our inclusion criteria. Among patients undergoing primary ACLR, 82.8% to 100% were able to return to play, with 64% to 100% able to return at the same or higher level of play. All professional athletes were able to return to play, and 85.7% to 100% were able to return to the same level of preoperative play. The mean time to return was 5 to 11 months in those undergoing primary ACLR + EA. Among those undergoing revision ACLR, 50% to 88.4% were able to return to play, with 41.5% to 77.8% able to return at the same or higher level of play. None of the 5 studies that compared rate of return to play (at any level) between ACLR + EA and ACLR alone found a significant difference between them. However, among the 6 studies that compared rate of return to play at the same level between ACLR + EA and ACLR alone, 2 studies found a significantly higher rate of return to play with ACLR + EA.

CONCLUSION:

ACLR + EA resulted in high levels of return to play in those undergoing either primary or revision ACLR. Additionally, comparative studies of patients undergoing primary ACLR with or without EA reported similarly high rates of return to play. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, systematic review of level I to IV studies.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atletas / Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Volta ao Esporte / Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atletas / Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Volta ao Esporte / Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article