Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is it Wise to Omit Sentinel Node Biopsy in Elderly Patients with Breast Cancer?
Sun, James; Mathias, Brittany J; Sun, Weihong; Fulp, William J; Zhou, Jun-Min; Laronga, Christine; Loftus, Loretta S; Lee, M Catherine.
Afiliação
  • Sun J; Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Mathias BJ; Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Sun W; Mercy Clinic Breast Surgery - Coletta, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
  • Fulp WJ; Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Zhou JM; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Laronga C; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Loftus LS; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Lee MC; Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 28(1): 320-329, 2021 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32613363
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Society of Surgical Oncology's Choosing Wisely® guidelines recommend against routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-negative (cN0), hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer patients aged ≥ 70 years. We examined the effect of SLNB on treatment and outcomes in this population. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A single-institution retrospective review of consecutive cN0 women ≥ 70 years of age who received SLNB was performed. We collected clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment data. Patients were compared according to SLN status with subset analysis of HR-positive patients. Outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and univariable analysis, and were compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS:

Of 500 patients, 345 (69%) were SLN-negative. Median age was 74 years (range 70-96). Most tumors were T1 (72%), N0 (69%), invasive ductal (77%), without lymphovascular invasion (88%), estrogen receptor-positive (88%) and progesterone receptor-positive (75%), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (88%) treated with lumpectomy (71%). Median number of SLNs obtained was 2 (range 0-12) and median number of positive SLNs was 0 (range 0-8). Characteristics of the HR-positive subset were similar. In both the overall cohort and the HR-positive subset, SLN status significantly affected the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, although no significant effect on recurrence was observed. SLN-negative patients had better overall survival and less distant recurrence (both p < 0.0001). Adjuvant hormone therapy significantly improved overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS:

SLNB can be safely omitted in elderly patients with T1, HR-positive, invasive ductal carcinoma tumors, but may still provide important information affecting treatment. Patients who are candidates for adjuvant systemic chemotherapy should still be considered for SLNB.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article